دوره 33، شماره 160 - ( 7-1404 )                   جلد 33 شماره 160 صفحات 206-198 | برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها

Ethics code: IR.ZUMS.REC.1399.436

XML English Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Toubaei M, Ghoreishi A, Kamali K, Nateghi S, Saeid S P. Evaluation of the Outcome of Carotid Endarterectomy Following Ischemic Stroke in Vali-e-Asr Hospital, Zanjan, 2016 to 2020. J Adv Med Biomed Res 2025; 33 (160) :198-206
URL: http://journal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-7567-fa.html
Evaluation of the Outcome of Carotid Endarterectomy Following Ischemic Stroke in Vali-e-Asr Hospital, Zanjan, 2016 to 2020. Journal of Advances in Medical and Biomedical Research. 1404; 33 (160) :198-206

URL: http://journal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-7567-fa.html


چکیده:   (432 مشاهده)

ackground & Objective:  Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a method to reduce the risk of occurrence or recurrence of stroke in patients with cerebrovascular atherosclerosis. Patients should be followed up after this surgery to evaluate the neurological consequences. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term and long-term neurological consequences of CEA in terms of improvement of neurological complications, recurrent stroke, and recurrent stenosis after surgery based on technical conditions and specific patient characteristics.
 Materials & Methods:  Ischemic stroke patients admitted to the neurology ward of Zanjan Vali-e-Asr Hospital who underwent CEA by a single experienced vascular surgeon at the same center from 2016 to 2020 (n = 45) were included in the study. Patients were asked to return for cervical color duplex ultrasonography (CDU) and clinical examination. Additional information was collected from the patient's medical records and follow-up results. MRS criterion was used to evaluate neurological outcomes, and CT angiography and CDU were used to grade carotid artery stenosis.
Results:  No intraoperative complications were reported. At short-term follow-up (30 days), cardiovascular events occurred in 5% of patients, and surgical site hematoma was observed in 2.5%. At long-term follow-up (90 days), cerebrovascular events were reported in 7.5% of patients. Five patients were lost to follow-up. Both 30-day and 90-day postoperative mortality rates were 5%. No restenosis was detected among surviving patients who underwent CDU.
Conclusion:  This study demonstrated a 15% complication rate for CEA in Zanjan Vali-e-Asr Hospital, which was not significantly affected by demographic factors and comorbidities. CEA showed low short-term and long-term mortality rates, with acceptable overall results. Compared to other studies conducted globally and nationally, CEA outcomes at this center appear relatively safe for eligible patients, with relatively low re-stroke rates.

     
نوع مطالعه: مقاله پژوهشی | موضوع مقاله: Clinical Medicine
دریافت: 1404/3/14 | پذیرش: 1404/7/18 | انتشار: 1404/8/20

فهرست منابع
1. Randolph SA. Ischemic Stroke. Workplace Health Saf. 2016;64(9):444. [DOI:10.1177/2165079916665400] [PMID]
2. Phipps MS, Cronin CA. Management of acute ischemic stroke. Bmj. 2020;368:l6983. [DOI:10.1136/bmj.l6983] [PMID]
3. Sacco RL. Risk factors and outcomes for ischemic stroke. Neurology. 1995;45(2 Suppl 1):S10-4.
4. Chin YY, Sakinah H, Aryati A, Hassan BM. Prevalence, risk factors and secondary prevention of stroke recurrence in eight countries from south, east and southeast asia: a scoping review. Med J Malaysia. 2018;73(2):90-9.
5. DaCosta M, Tadi P, Surowiec SM. Carotid endarterectomy. 2023. StatPearls: StatPearls Publishing; 2023.
6. Tsivgoulis G, Safouris A, Kim DE, Alexandrov AV. Recent Advances in Primary and Secondary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Stroke. J Stroke. 2018;20(2):145-66. [DOI:10.5853/jos.2018.00773] [PMID] [PMCID]
7. Forjoe T, Asad Rahi M. Systematic review of preoperative carotid duplex ultrasound compared with computed tomography carotid angiography for carotid endarterectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2019;101(3):141-9. [DOI:10.1308/rcsann.2019.0010] [PMID] [PMCID]
8. Arnold M, Perler BA. Carotid artery endarterectomy. In: Sidawy AN, Perler BA, editors. Rutherford's Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2018. p.1218.
9. Banning LBD, Benjamens S, Bokkers RPH, Zeebregts CJ, Pol RA. Role of pre-operative frailty status in relation to outcome after carotid endarterectomy: a systematic review. Ann Transl Med. 2021;9(14):1205. [DOI:10.21037/atm-20-7225] [PMID] [PMCID]
10. Chabowski M, Grzebien A, Ziomek A, Dorobisz K, Leśniak M, Janczak D. Quality of life after carotid endarterectomy: a review of the literature. Acta Neurol Belg. 2017;117(4):829-35. [DOI:10.1007/s13760-017-0811-x] [PMID] [PMCID]
11. Ferguson GG, Eliasziw M, Barr HW, Clagett GP, Barnes RW, Wallace MC, et al. The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial : surgical results in 1415 patients. Stroke. 1999;30(9):1751-8. [DOI:10.1161/01.STR.30.9.1751] [PMID]
12. Hemati H, Moghadam NM, Shakiba M, Roudbari A, Yousefzadeh CS, Rimaz S. Postoperative Mortality and Morbidity of Carotid Endarterectomy in Patients with Carotid Stenosis. J Guilan Univ Med Sci. 2011;20(77):49-54.
13. Parsa H, Talebian P, Naderi F. Mortality and Morbidity during and after Carotid Endarterectomy. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2014;24(114):140-5.
14. Modaghegh MH, Ghandehari K, Masoudinezhad SH. Prognosis of Carotid Endarterectomy in High Risk Patients. J Shahid Sadoughi Univ Med Sci. 2016;24(1):34-40.
15. Ghandehari K, Modaghegh H. Assessment of carotid endarterectomy in a sample of Iranian patients. Iran J Neurol. 2010;5(4):140-146.
16. Kazantsev AN, Tarasov RS, Burkov NN, Shabaev AR, Lider RI, Mironov AV. [Carotid endarterectomy: three-year results of follow up within the framework of a single-centre register]. Angiol Sosud Khir. 2018;24(3):101-7. [DOI:10.33529/angio2019114] [PMID]
17. Farooq MU, Goshgarian C, Min J, Gorelick PB. Pathophysiology and management of reperfusion injury and hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting. Exp Transl Stroke Med. 2016;8(1):7. [DOI:10.1186/s13231-016-0021-2] [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Jeong MJ, Kwon H, Jung CH, Kwon SU, Kim MJ, Han Y, et al. Comparison of outcomes after carotid endarterectomy between type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic patients with significant carotid stenosis. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019;18(1):41. [DOI:10.1186/s12933-019-0848-7] [PMID] [PMCID]
19. Dempsey RJ, Moore RW, Cordero S. Factors leading to early recurrence of carotid plaque after carotid endarterectomy. Surg Neurol. 1995;43(3):278-82. [DOI:10.1016/0090-3019(95)80014-8] [PMID]
20. Capoccia L, Sbarigia E, Speziale F, Toni D, Fiorani P. Urgent carotid endarterectomy to prevent recurrence and improve neurologic outcome in mild-to-moderate acute neurologic events. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53(3):622-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2010.09.016] [PMID]
21. Howie B, Witek A, Bain M, Hussain S, Toth G. P-031 Outcomes and restenosis rates following carotid artery revascularization in a predominantly symptomatic patient population. J Neurointerv Surg. 2018;10:A41-A42. [DOI:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-SNIS.67]
22. Alves-Ferreira J, Rocha-Neves J, Dias-Neto M, Braga SF. Poor long-term outcomes after carotid endarterectomy: a retrospective analysis of two portuguese centers. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2019;53(5):266-73. [DOI:10.1080/14017431.2019.1638518] [PMID]
23. Pini R, Vacirca A, Palermo S, Gallitto E, Mascoli C, Gargiulo M, et al. Impact of cerebral ischemic lesions on the outcome of carotid endarterectomy. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8(19):1264. [DOI:10.21037/atm-20-1098] [PMID] [PMCID]
24. Yang S-S, Kim Y-W, Kim D-I, Kim K-h, Jeon P, Kim G-M, et al. Impact of contralateral carotid or vertebral artery occlusion in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg. 2014;59(3):749-55. [DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2013.10.055] [PMID]
25. Mortimer R, Nachiappan S, Howlett DC. Carotid artery stenosis screening: where are we now? Br J Radiol. 2018;91(1090):20170380. [DOI:10.1259/bjr.20170380] [PMID] [PMCID]
26. Ballotta E, Angelini A, Mazzalai F, Piatto G, Toniato A, Baracchini C. Carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic low-grade carotid stenosis. J Vasc Surg. 2014;59(1):25-31. [DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2013.06.079] [PMID]

بازنشر اطلاعات
Creative Commons License این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است.

کلیه حقوق این وب سایت متعلق به Journal of Advances in Medical and Biomedical Research می باشد.

طراحی و برنامه نویسی : یکتاوب افزار شرق

© 2026 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Advances in Medical and Biomedical Research

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb