دوشنبه 12 مرداد 1405
[Archive]
پذیرفته شده و در حال انتشار
برگشت به فهرست مقالات |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
چکیده: (158 مشاهده)
Background: Postoperative hemorrhage represents a significant complication following open prostatectomy. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of conventional open prostatectomy with a modified technique incorporating additional sutures for bladder neck reconstruction.
Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed the medical records of patients diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who underwent open prostatectomy at Imam Khomeini Hospital, Urmia, Iran, between 2018 and 2022. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the surgical approach: conventional open prostatectomy and the modified technique. Demographic data, preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin levels, blood transfusion requirements, length of hospital stay, and preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were compared between the groups. Additionally, mean prostate volume, packed cell volume, and the presence of underlying comorbidities were assessed.
Results: A total of 208 patients underwent open prostatectomy: 108 received the modified technique, and 100 underwent the conventional approach. The mean age of the study population was 69.7 ± 4.10 years. No significant intergroup differences were observed in baseline characteristics, including age (p=0.131), body mass index (p=0.076), prostate volume (p=0.643), and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level (p=0.812). Patients in the modified prostatectomy group exhibited a significantly shorter length of hospital stay (5.4 ± 0.9 days) compared to the conventional group (p<0.001). The requirement for packed red blood cell transfusions was significantly lower in the modified prostatectomy group (10.2%) compared to the conventional group (29%) (p=0.002).
Conclusion: The findings suggest that modified open prostatectomy with additional sutures for bladder neck reconstruction may offer several advantages over the conventional technique.
Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed the medical records of patients diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who underwent open prostatectomy at Imam Khomeini Hospital, Urmia, Iran, between 2018 and 2022. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the surgical approach: conventional open prostatectomy and the modified technique. Demographic data, preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin levels, blood transfusion requirements, length of hospital stay, and preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were compared between the groups. Additionally, mean prostate volume, packed cell volume, and the presence of underlying comorbidities were assessed.
Results: A total of 208 patients underwent open prostatectomy: 108 received the modified technique, and 100 underwent the conventional approach. The mean age of the study population was 69.7 ± 4.10 years. No significant intergroup differences were observed in baseline characteristics, including age (p=0.131), body mass index (p=0.076), prostate volume (p=0.643), and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level (p=0.812). Patients in the modified prostatectomy group exhibited a significantly shorter length of hospital stay (5.4 ± 0.9 days) compared to the conventional group (p<0.001). The requirement for packed red blood cell transfusions was significantly lower in the modified prostatectomy group (10.2%) compared to the conventional group (29%) (p=0.002).
Conclusion: The findings suggest that modified open prostatectomy with additional sutures for bladder neck reconstruction may offer several advantages over the conventional technique.
فهرست منابع
1. Chughtai B, Forde JC, Thomas DD, Laor L, Hossack T, Woo HH,et al. Benign prostatic hyperplasia. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16031. [DOI:10.1038/nrdp.2016.31] [PMID]
2. Ng M, Leslie SW, Baradhi KM. Benign prostatic hyperplasia. 2024. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025.
3. Parsons JK. Benign prostatic hyperplasia and male lower urinary tract symptoms: Epidemiology and risk Factors. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep. 2010;5:212-8. [DOI:10.1007/s11884-010-0067-2] [PMID] [PMCID]
4. Lokeshwar SD, Harper BT, Webb E, Jordan A, Dykes TA, Neal DE Jr, et al. Epidemiology and treatment modalities for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Transl Androl Urol. 2019;8(5):529-39. [DOI:10.21037/tau.2019.10.01] [PMID] [PMCID]
5. Abdelmoteleb H, Jefferies ER, Drake MJ. Assessment and management of male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Int J Surg. 2016;25:164-71. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.11.043] [PMID]
6. Das AK, Leong JY, Roehrborn CG. Office-based therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a review and update. Can J Urol. 2019;26(4 Suppl 1):2-7.
7. Chung A, Woo HH. What's truly minimally invasive in benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery? Curr Opin Urol. 2014;24(1):36-41. [DOI:10.1097/MOU.0000000000000006] [PMID]
8. Fogaing C, Alsulihem A, Campeau L, Corcos J. Is early surgical treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia preferable to prolonged medical therapy: Pros and Cons. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021;57(4):368. [DOI:10.3390/medicina57040368] [PMID] [PMCID]
9. Foster HE, Barry MJ, Dahm P, Gandhi MC, Kaplan SA, Kohler TS, et al. Surgical management of lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia: AUA Guideline. J Urol. 2018;200(3):612-19. [DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2018.05.048] [PMID] [PMCID]
10. Rocco B, Albo G, Ferreira RC, Spinelli M, Cozzi G, Dell'orto P, et al. Recent advances in the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Ther Adv Urol. 2011;3(6):263-72. [DOI:10.1177/1756287211426301] [PMID] [PMCID]
11. Oranusi CK, Nwofor AM, Oranusi IO. Complication rates of open transvesical prostatectomy according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system. Niger J Clin Pract. 2012;15(1). [DOI:10.4103/1119-3077.94094] [PMID]
12. Moslemi MK, Abedin Zadeh M. A modified technique of simple suprapubic prostatectomy: no bladder drainage and no bladder neck or hemostatic sutures. Urol J. 2010;7(1):51-5.
13. Amu OC, Affusim EA, Nnadozie UU, Mbadiwe O. Malament stitch and increased risk of bladder neck stenosis: any association following open prostatectomy in Enugu Southeast Nigeria. BMC Urol. 2022;22:1-7. [DOI:10.1186/s12894-021-00944-y] [PMID] [PMCID]
14. Choo MS, Lee HE, Bae J, Cho SY, Oh SJ. Transurethral surgical anatomy of the arterial bleeder in the enucleated capsular plane of enlarged prostates during holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. Int Neurourol J. 2014;18(3):138-44. [DOI:10.5213/inj.2014.18.3.138] [PMID] [PMCID]
15. Oh SJ, Shitara T. Enucleation of the prostate: An anatomical perspective. Andrologia. 2020 Sep;52(8):e13744. [DOI:10.1111/and.13744]
16. Jr Soletti G, Cancelli G, Dell'Aquila M, Caldonazo T, Harik L, Rossi C, et al. Re-exploration for bleeding and long-term survival after adult cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data. Int J Surg. 2024 Sep 1;110(9):5795-5801. [DOI:10.1097/JS9.0000000000001765] [PMID] [PMCID]
17. Mohyelden K, Abdel-Kader O. Open prostatectomy with a rectal balloon: A new technique to control postoperative blood loss. Arab J Urol. 2015;13(2):100-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.aju.2014.12.003] [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Obi AO, Okeke CJ, Ulebe AO, Ogbobe UU. The modified suprapubic prostatectomy technique is associated with improved hemostasis and decline in blood transfusion rate after open suprapubic prostatectomy compared to the Freyers technique. Niger J Clin Pract. 2022;25(4):432-8. [DOI:10.4103/njcp.njcp_1391_21] [PMID]
19. Okorie CO, Salia M, Liu P, Pisters LL. Modified suprapubic prostatectomy without irrigation is safe. Urology. 2010;75(3):701-5. [DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.109] [PMID]
20. Okwudili OA. 42 consecutive open suprapubic prostatectomies without blood transfusion or continuous bladder irrigation. J Urol Ren Dis 2018;185:1‑8.
21. Galvin DJ, Eastham JA. Critical appraisal of outcomes following open radical prostatectomy. Curr Opin Urol. 2009;19(3):297-302. [DOI:10.1097/MOU.0b013e328329eb13] [PMID]
22. Prabhu V, Sivarajan G, Taksler GB, Laze J, Lepor H. Long-term continence outcomes in men undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2014 ;65(1):52-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2013.08.006] [PMID] [PMCID]
23. Lower WE. Complete closure of the bladder following prostatectomy: preliminary report. J Am Med Assoc. 1927;89(10):749-51. [DOI:10.1001/jama.1927.02690100011004]
24. Harris SH. Suprapubic prostatectomy with closure. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1930;50:251‑60.
25. Hryntschak T. Suprapubic transvesical prostatectomy with primary closure of the bladder; improved technique and latest results. J Int Coll Surg. 1951;15:366-8.
26. De La Pena A, Alcina E. Suprapubic prostatectomy: a new technique to prevent bleeding. J Urol. 1962;88:86-90. [DOI:10.1016/S0022-5347(17)64743-8] [PMID]
27. Malement M. Maximal hemostasis in suprapubic prostatectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1965;120:1307‑12.
28. Denis R. Prostatectomy under depression. J Urol Nephrol (Paris). 1970;76(7):663-72. French.
29. Lee DI, Wedmid A, Mendoza P, Sharma S, Walicki M, Hastings R, et al. Bladder neck plication stitch: a novel technique during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy to improve recovery of urinary continence. J Endourol. 2011;25(12):1873-77. [DOI:10.1089/end.2011.0279] [PMID]
30. Seaman EK, Benson MC. Improved continence with tubularized bladder neck reconstruction following radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology. 1996;47(4):532-5. [DOI:10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80490-7] [PMID]
31. Vickers AJ, Cronin AM, Masterson TA, Eastham JA. How do you tell whether a change in surgical technique leads to a change in outcome? J Urol. 2010;183(4):1510-4. [DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.034] [PMID] [PMCID]
32. Dall'oglio MF, Srougi M, Antunes AA, Crippa A, Cury J. An improved technique for controlling bleeding during simple retropubic prostatectomy: a randomized controlled study. BJU Int. 2006;98(2):384-7. [DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06236.x] [PMID]
33. Adam C, Hofstetter A, Deubner J, Zaak D, Weitkunat R, Seitz M, Schneede P. Retropubic transvesical prostatectomy for significant prostatic enlargement must remain a standard part of urology training. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2004;38(6):472-6. [DOI:10.1080/00365590410015858] [PMID]
34. Saha S, Trivedi B, Ojha S, Ambulkar R, Nambiar A, Sarwade K, et al. Towards rational blood utilization: development of a transfusion risk prediction tool for onco-surgical practice. World J Surg Oncol. 2026;24(1):171. [DOI:10.1186/s12957-026-04232-7] [PMID] [PMCID]
35. Wagaskar VG, Zaytoun O, Kale P, Pedraza A, Haines K, Tewari A. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy for prostates greater than 100 g. World J Urol. 2023;41(4):1169-1174. [DOI:10.1007/s00345-023-04326-x] [PMID]
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
