Volume 28, Issue 128 (May & June 2020)                   J Adv Med Biomed Res 2020, 28(128): 124-131 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Kamaliaghdam M, Sadeghzadeh M, Jalilvand A, Eftekhari K, Rezaei Z. Antibiotic Sensitivity Patterns of Escherichia coli Isolated in Urine Samples of Patients Referred to Ayatollah Mousavi Hospital in Zanjan. J Adv Med Biomed Res 2020; 28 (128) :124-131
URL: http://journal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-5885-en.html
1- Dept. of Pediatrics, Ayatollah Moussavi Hospital, School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran
2- Dept. of Pediatrics, Ayatollah Moussavi Hospital, School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran , sadeghzadeh@zums.ac.ir
3- Dept. of Pathology, Ayatollah Moussavi Hospital, School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran
4- Dept. of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Bahrami Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Full-Text [PDF 402 kb]   (155229 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (143106 Views)

✅ Because of the high resistance rate of E. coli to cefixime, precautions should be taken before using cefixime to treat UTIs.


Full-Text:   (3007 Views)
Introduction
 

Escherichia coli (E. coli) is the most common organism causing urinary tract infections (UTIs) (1) and is the cause of about 90% of all UTIs in young women (2). UTIs are very common infectious diseases, both as community- and hospital-acquired infections (3,4). It is estimated that 10-20% of infections treated by primary care physicians and 30-40% of hospital-treated infections are due to UTIs (4). These infections are more common in females and are found in about 40% of all females, with a 30% chance of relapse. UTIs are also more prevalent in the elderly than in younger people. The majority of UTI cases are mild (5), but they can lead to end-stage renal scarring, hypertension, and renal dysfunction, especially when the kidney is affected (6.). The purpose of treating UTIs is to provide a quick cure and prevent complications. To achieve this goal in patients suspected of having a UTI, empirical treatment should be initiated before preparing the urine culture results (7,8). Due to the recent rise in bacterial resistance to antibiotics and the appearance of multidrug-resistant (MDR) E. coli, treatment options have been significantly limited; in developing countries, this situation may have a significant impact on treatment costs and increase the morbidity and mortality rates associated with UTIs (4,9). UTIs caused by resistant pathogens have a longer recovery period and higher relapse rates, and they mostly depend on various courses of antibiotic therapy (5). Thus, it is essential to be aware of the current antibiotic susceptibility patterns of E. coli (the main bacterial cause of UTIs) in order to determine the most appropriate choice for empiric treatment (4). Antibiotic susceptibility patterns differ by location and time, so periodically testing antibiotic resistance in different hospitals, cities, and nations is crucial (2,5,10). Although many factors affect antibiotic resistance, the inappropriate and widespread use of antibiotics plays an important role (11). This study aimed to identify the antibiotic susceptibility pattern of E. coli in order to determine effective early empirical treatments and cultures for negative UTIs caused by previous antibiotic usage. By increasing the quality of treatment and decreasing the duration of treatment, we can reduce complications and reduce the cost of treatment.

 

Materials and Methods

 In this study, we examined all urinary samples (24,706 cases) from inpatients and ambulatory patients referred to the laboratory of Ayatollah Mousavi Hospital in Zanjan between August 21, 2015, and August 21, 2016. Urine sampling was performed as a mid-stream urine clean catch in a sterile container. In children under three years old, samples were collected in a urine bag. The samples were immediately transferred to the laboratory and cultured in an agar plate. The culture plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 hours. Positive cultures were identified through standard biochemical methods. The isolation of a single type with colony counts of more than 105 colony-forming unit/mL was regarded as positive urine cultures. Positive cultures other than E. coli were discarded. There were a total of 704 E. coli positive samples for which antibiotic susceptibility to gentamicin, nitrofurantoin, ceftazidime, cefixime, meropenem, cefotaxime, cefepime, azithromycin, ceftriaxone, and ciprofloxacin, was examined using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. One isolate per patient was included in the study. Data were collected based on age, sex, and hospitalization or outpatient status. Values were expressed as numbers and percentages. Comparisons for categorical variables were performed via a Chi-square test. A P-value<0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. The data were analyzed using SPSS 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). This study was approved by the ethics committee of Zanjan University of Medical Sciences and has been registered with the code (zums.REC.1394.222).
 
 

Results

In this study, among 24,706 urine samples cultured in Ayatollah Mousavi Hospital Laboratory in Zanjan from August 21, 2015, to August 21, 2016, 704 E. coli positive urine samples were isolated. Of these isolates, 188 (26.7%) were derived from males, and 516 (73.3%) were derived from females. There were 216 (30.7%) inpatient samples and 488 (69.3%) from ambulatory settings. In terms of age distribution, 24 (3.4%) were under one month, 86 (12.2%) were 1-12 months, 68 (9.7%) were 1-5 years, 68 (9.7%) were 5-10 years, 30 (4.3%) were 10-18 years, 216 (30.7%) were 18-40 years, 132 (18.8%) were 40-65 years, and 80 (11.4%) were over 65 years old.
The sensitivities of isolated E. coli to common antibiotics are shown in Table 1, and their differences by gender are shown in Table 2. These findings showed that for all antibiotics, E. coli is more resistant in men than in women (P=0.00).
Based on the results of this study, E. coli samples obtained from hospitalized patients showed a higher rate of resistance than outpatients (P=0/00) (Table 3).
Antibiotic susceptibility findings of the E. coli isolated from urine samples of UTI patients by age are shown in Table 4.

Table 1. The sensitivity of the isolated E. coli from patients’ urine samples   

Number of isolates (percent) Antibiotics
sensitive intermediate resistant
644(91.5) 10(1.4) 50(7.1) Meropenem
568(80.7) 34(4.8) 102(14.5) Ceftazidime
568(80.7) 40(5.7) 96(13.6) Cefepime
508(72.2) 20(2.8) 176(25) Azithromycin
572(81.2) 18(2.6) 114(16.2) Gentamicin
472(67) 20(2.8) 212(30.2) Ceftriaxone
520(73.9) 4(0.6) 180(25.5) Ciprofloxacine
440(62.5) 18(2.6) 246(34.9) Cefixime
664(94.3) 8(1.2) 32(4.5) Nitrofurantoin
 
 

Table 2.  The sensitivity of the isolated E.coli from patients’ urine samples by gender

P-value Number of isolates (percent) Gender Antibiotics
sensitive intermediate resistant
0.001< 148(78.8) 4(2.1) 36(19.1) male Meropenem
496(96.1) 6(1.2) 14(2.7) female
0.001 110(58.5) 16(8.5) 62(33) male Ceftazidime
458(88.8) 18(3.5) 40(7.8) female
0.001 106(56.4) 20(10.6) 62(33) male Cefepime
462(89.5) 20(3.9) 34(6.6) female
0.08 120(63.8) 4(2.1) 64(34) male Azithromycin
388(75.2) 16(3.1) 112(21.7) female
0.001< 118(62.8) 10(5.3) 60(31.9) male Gentamicin
454(88) 8(3) 54(10.5) female
0.001< 86(45.8) 4(2.1) 98(52.1) male Ceftriaxone
368(74.8) 16(3.1) 114(22.1) female
0.001< 106(56.4) - 82(43.6) male Ciprofloxacine
414(80.2) 4(0.8) 98(19) female
0.001< 82(43.6) 4(2.1) 102(54.3) male Cefixime
358(69.4) 14(2.7) 144(27.9) female
0.001< 160(85.1) 2(1.1) 26(13.8) male Nitrofurantoin
504(97.6) 6(1.2) 6(1.2) female
 

Table 3. The sensitivity of the isolated E. coli from patients’ urine samples by Hospitalization status

P-value Number of isolates (percent) Hospitalization status Antibiotics
sensitive intermediate resistant
<0.001 188(87) 4(1.9) 24(11.1) inpatient Meropenem
546(93.4) 6(1.2) 26(5.3) outpatient
<0.001 146(67.6) 16(7.4) 54(25) inpatient Ceftazidime
422(86.5) 18(3.7) 48(9.8) outpatient
<0.001 142(65.7) 12(5.6) 62(28.7) inpatient Cefepime
426(87.3) 28(5.7) 34(7) outpatient
<0.001 134(62) 2(0.9) 80(37) inpatient Azithromycin
372(76.2) 18(3.7) 96(1907) outpatient
<0.001 150(69.4) 8(3.7) 58(26.9) inpatient Gentamicin
422(86.5) 10(2) 56(11.5) outpatient
<0.001 106(49.1) 4(1.8) 106(49.1) inpatient Ceftriaxone
366(75) 16(3.3) 106(21.7) outpatient
<0.001 126(58.3) - 90(41.7) inpatient Ciprofloxacine
394(80.7) 4(0.8) 90(18.5) outpatient
<0.001 98(45.4) 2(0.9) 116(53.7) inpatient Cefixime
342(70.1) 16(3.3) 130(26.6) outpatient
<0.001 186(86.1) 2(0.9) 28(13) inpatient Nitrofurantoin
478(98) 6(1.2) 4(0.8) outpatient
 

Table 4. Frequency and percent of antibiotic susceptibility of E. coli samples by age

P-value            Number of isolates (percent) Age Antibiotics
sensitive intermediate resistant
0.03 22(91.7) - 2(8.3) <1month Meropenem
72(83.7) - 14(16.3) 1-12 months
66(97.1) - 2(2.9) 5-1years
62(91.2) 2(2.90 4(5.9) 10-5 years
28(93.3) - 2(6.7) 18-10 years
200(92.6) 6(2.8) 10(4.6) 40-18 years
70(93.9) - 8(6.1) 65-40 years
70(87.5) 2(2.5) 8(10) ≤65 years
<0.001 20(83.3) - 4(16.7) <1month Ceftazidime
64(74.4) 2(2.3) 20(23.3) 1-12 months
58(85.3) 6(8.8) 4(5.9) 5-1years
58(85.3) 2(2.9) 8(11.8) 10-5 years
24(80) - 6(20) 18-10 years
190(88) 6(2.7) 20(9.3) 40-18 years
108(81.8) 10(7.6) 14(10.6) 65-40 years
46(57.5) 8(10) 26(32.5) ≤65 years
<0.001 20(83.3) - 4(6.7) <1month Cefepime
62(72.1) 2(2.3) 22(25.6) 1-12 months
56(82.4) 8(11.8) 4(5.9) 5-1years
56(82.4) - 12(17.6) 10-5 years
26(86.7) 2(6.7) 2(6.7) 18-10 years
194(89.8) 4(1.9) 18(8.3) 40-18 years
104(78.8) 16(12.1) 12(9.1) 65-40 years
50(62.5) 8(10) 22(27.5) ≤65 years
0.016 20(83.3) - 4(16.7) <1month Azithromycin
50(58.1) 4(4.7) 32(37.2) 1-12 months
50(73.5) 2(2.9) 14(20.6) 5-1years
50(73.5) 2(2.9) 16(32.5) 10-5 years
20(66.7) 2(6.7) 8(26.7) 18-10 years
162(75) 6(2.8) 48(22.2) 40-18 years
90(68.2) 2(2.5) 40(30.3) 65-40 years
64(80) 2(2.5) 14(17.5) ≤65 years
0/032 20(83.3) - 4(6.7) <1month Gentamicin
66(76.8) 2(2.3) 18(20.9) 1-12 months
54(79.4) - 14(20.6) 5-1years
60(88.2) - 8(11.8) 10-5 years
22(73.3) - 8(26.7) 18-10 years
186(86.1) 4(1.9) 26(12) 40-18 years
106(80.3) 6(4.5) 20(15.2) 65-40 years
58(72.5) 6(7.5) 16(20) ≤65 years
<0.001 20(83.3) - 4(16.7) <1month Ceftriaxone
48(55.8) 4(4.7) 34(39.5) 1-12 months
52(76.5) 2(2.9) 14(20.6) 5-1years
54(79.4) 4(5.9) 10(14.7) 10-5 years
20(66.7) 2(6.7) (26.7) 18-10 years
162)75( 6(2.8) 48(22.2) 40-18 years
78(59.1) 2(1.5) 52(39.4) 65-40 years
38(47.5) - 42(52.5) ≤65 years
<0.001 20(83.3) - 4(16.7) <1month Ciprofloxacine
54(62.8) - 32(37.2) 1-12 months
54(79.5) 2(2.9) 12(17.6) 5-1years
60(88.2) - 8(11.8) 10-5 years
24(80) - 6(20) 18-10 years
178(82.4) 2(0.9) 36(16.7) 40-18 years
86(65.2) - 46(34.8) 65-40 years
44(55) - 36(45) ≤65 years
<0.001 20(83.3) - 4(16.7) <1month Cefixime
38(44.2) - 48(55.8) 1-12 months
48(70.6) 2(2.9) 18(26.5) 5-1years
48(70.6) 4(5.9) 16(23.5) 10-5 years
20(66.7) - 10(33.3) 18-10 years
156(70.2) 2(2.9) 58(26.9) 40-18 years
72(54.5) 10(7.6) 50(37.9) 65-40 years
38(47.5) - 42(52.5) ≤65 years
0.636 22(91.7) - 2(8.3) <1month Nitrofurantoin
80(93) 2(2.3) 4(4.7) 1-12 months
66(97.1) - 2(2.9) 5-1years
64(94.1) 2(2.9) 2(2.9) 10-5 years
28(93.3) - 2(6.7) 18-10 years
204(94.4) 4(1.9) 8(3.7) 40-18 years
126(95.5) - 6(4.5) 65-40 years
74(92.5) - 6(7.5) ≤65 years


 

Discussioon

Our study showed that the antibiotic resistance of E. coli isolates varied from 4.5% to nearly 35% with different antibiotics (12-15).
Kullkarni et al. examined 1,000 urine samples of patients suspected of having a UTI. Of these, 395 had positive E. coli cultures, 170 (43%) of which showed MDR. The resistance rates against ampicillin and ceftriaxone were 82.53% and 66.58%, respectively. However, the sensitivity to imipenem was 96.71%, and sensitivity to nitrofurantoin was 92.41% (16).
In a five-year study on the first UTI with positive E. coli culture, Fasugba found that the highest antibiotic resistance rates were found for ampicillin (41.9%) and co-trimoxazole (20.7%). The lowest antibiotic resistance rates were reported for meropenem (0.0%) and nitrofurantoin (2.9%) (17).
Dehbani Pour et al. examined E. coli in Esfahan; it showed high resistance to ceftriaxone (13). In another study by Ferdowsi et al. in Babol in 2013, E. coli resistance to cefixime and ceftriaxone was reported to be ≥ 35.1%, which is consistent with the results of the current study (18). Overall, these data indicate that resistance to nitrofurantoin is low among E. coli isolates. There are several factors involved in preventing E. coli resistance to nitrofurantoin. Of course, nitrofurantoin is not widely used because of its unpleasant taste and inefficiency in pyelonephritis due to its low tissue penetration.
Sanchez GV et al. conducted a population-based study from 2000 to 2010 in the United States to investigate the in vitro antimicrobial resistance of urine E. coli isolates. They found that resistance to nitrofurantoin increased from 0.8% to1.6% over this time. However, the resistance level for ciprofloxacin increased from 3% to 17.1% (19). In 2012, Kahlmeter G. et al. showed a low rate of resistance to nitrofurantoin, while the resistance during 2007-2008 was ≤ 2% (15). In the present study, E. coli exhibited the greatest resistance to cefixime, supporting the findings of Mirsoleymani et al. in Bandar Abbas, Iran, from 2009-2012 (12). Our study showed that for all antibiotics, E. coli resistance in men was greater than in women. This is similar to the results presented by Rossana Rosa, Alos, and Gupta (14,20,21). In general, all cases of UTI are considered to be complicated in men, especially when they occur in infants and children or in association with neurological disorders such as bladder outlet obstruction (prostatic hyperplasia) or urinary tract manipulation. However, uncomplicated UTIs also occur in a small number of men between the ages of 15-50 years. (22) We also studied the sensitivity of E. coli to antibiotics in terms of hospitalization and outpatient. Our results revealed that urine isolated E. coli from hospitalized patients showed greater resistance to all antibiotics when compared to ambulatory patients. This difference was statistically significant (P=0.00). Dehbanipour also reported higher overall antibiotic resistance and multidrug resistance in hospitalized patients than in ambulatory patients (13). Hospital pathogens typically show greater resistance than community-acquired pathogens (13). Of course, for a variety of reasons, hospitalized patients have poorer immune systems than ambulatory patients, and the underlying factor that leads to hospitalization may also be added to the resistance problem. Regarding the pattern of antibiotic resistance based on age group, the findings of this study showed that antibiotic resistance is higher in the newborn infants and patients over 65 years old than in other age groups. This may be due to comorbidities in elderly people and the weakened immune systems of these individuals. On the other hand, hospitalization rates in infants and the elderly are higher than other age groups, which, as mentioned, can increase the rate of antibiotic resistance (23). Our results showed that—except in the age group below one month and above 65 years, for which UTIs were more prevalent in males—the majority of cases were females. This is similar to the results presented by Dehbanipour (13) but different from those provided by Mirsoleymani, who found that UTIs were more common in males than females (12). This discrepancy may be due to differences in the populations that comprised the study groups. In our study, all age groups were included, whereas only pediatric populations were evaluated by Mirsoleymani (12).


 

Conclusion

In this study, as predicted, the highest prevalence of E. coli infection was observed in the age group of 18-40 years, especially in women. Due to sexual activity and the anatomy of the genital tract, women in this age group are susceptible to UTIs. Considering the high resistance of E. coli to cefixime and ceftriaxone, this study suggests that these drugs are not appropriate antibiotics for UTI therapy, possibly due to the overuse of these antibiotics in recent years.
Therefore, it is suggested that cefixime should be used more cautiously for empiric therapy in cystitis. For treating severe cases of pyelonephritis, dual-agent therapy (ceftazidime or cefepime with an aminoglycoside), or carbapenem alone, is recommended. This study also emphasized the importance of the appropriate use of antibiotics, especially cefixime and ceftriaxone, in avoiding further increases in antibiotic resistance.


 

Acknowledgements

This project was a thesis for a medical degree and was founded by the Research Department of Zanjan University of Medical Sciences. The authors greatly appreciate for the generous cooperation of the laboratory staff of Ayatollah Mousavi Hospital in Zanjan.

 

Conflicts of Interest

Authors declared no conflict of interests.

 

Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: Epidemiologic studies
Received: 2019/12/29 | Accepted: 2020/04/10 | Published: 2020/05/1

References
1. Matthews SJ, Lancaster JW. Urinary tract infections in the elderly population. Am J Geriatric Pharmacother. 2011; 9 (5): 286-309. [DOI:10.1016/j.amjopharm.2011.07.002]
2. Raeispour M, Ranjbar R. Antibiotic resistance, virulence factors and genotyping of Uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control.2018;7:118. [DOI:10.1186/s13756-018-0411-4]
3. Odongo I, Ssemambo R, Kungu JM. Prevalence of Escherichia Coli and its antimicrobial susceptibility profiles among patients with UTI at Mulago Hospital, Kampala, Uganda. interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. 2020;2020:8042540. doi: 10.1155/2020/8042540. eCollection 2020. [DOI:10.1155/2020/8042540]
4. Stefaniuk E, Suchocka U,Bosacka K, Hryniewicz W.Etiology and antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial pathogens responsible for community-acquired urinary tract infections in Poland. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;35(8):1363-9. doi: 10.1007/s10096-016-2673-1. [DOI:10.1007/s10096-016-2673-1]
5. Yekani M,Baghi HB,Sefidan FY,, Azargun R, Memar MY,Ghotaslou R. The rates of quinolone, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and aminoglycoside resistance among Enterobacteriaceae isolated from urinary tract infections in Azerbaijan, Iran. GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2018;13:Doc07. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000313. eCollection 2018.
6. Conover MS, Hibbing ME, Hultgren S. Introduction to urinary tract infections. Metabolism of Human Diseases: Organ Physiology and Pathophysiology. 2014: 357. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-7091-0715-7_52]
7. Al Benwan K, Al Sweih N, Rotimi VO. Etiology and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of community- and hospital-acquired urinary tract infections in a general hospital in Kuwait. Med Princ Pract. 2010; 19 (6): 440-6. [DOI:10.1159/000320301]
8. Dibua UM, Onyemerela IS, Nweze EI. Frequency, urinalysis and susceptibility profile of pathogens causing urinary tract infections in Enugu State, southeast Nigeria. Magazine do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo. 2014; 56 (1): 55-9. [DOI:10.1590/S0036-46652014000100008]
9. Niranjan V, Malini A. Antimicrobial resistance pattern in Escherichia coli causing urinary tract infection among inpatients. Indian J Med Res. 2014;139(6):945-8.
10. Sudheendra Ramesh Kulkarni, Basavaraj V. Peerapur, Kumar Sai Sailesh. Isolation and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Escherichia coli from urinary tract infections in a tertiary care hospital of north eastern Karnataka.J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2017; 8(2): 176-180. doi: 10.4103/0976-9668.210012 [DOI:10.4103/0976-9668.210012]
11. Kiffer CR, Mendes C, Oplustil CP, Sampaio JL. Antibiotic resistance and trend of urinary pathogens in general outpatients from a major urban city. Int Brazil J Urol. 2007; 33 (1): 42-9. [DOI:10.1590/S1677-55382007000100007]
12. Mirsoleymani SR, Salimi M, Shareghi Brojeni M, Ranjbar M, Mehtarpoor M. Bacterial pathogens and antimicrobial resistance patterns in pediatric urinary tract infections: a four-year surveillance study (2009-2012). Int J Pediatr. 2014; Article ID 126142. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/126142 [DOI:10.1155/2014/126142. .]
13. Dehbanipour R, Rastaghi S, Sedighi M, Maleki N, Faghri J. High prevalence of multidrug-resistance uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains, Isfahan, Iran. J Natural Sci, Biol, and Med. 2016; 7 (1): 22. [DOI:10.4103/0976-9668.175020]
14. Gupta K, Hooton TM, Stamm WE. Isolation of fluoroquinolone-resistant rectal Escherichia coli after treatment of acute uncomplicated cystitis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005; 56 (1): 243-6. [DOI:10.1093/jac/dki169]
15. Kahlmeter G, Poulsen HO. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli from community-acquired urinary tract infections in Europe: the ECO • SENS study revisited. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2012; 39 (1): 45-51. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.09.013]
16. Kulkarni SR, Peerapur BV, Sailesh KS. Isolation and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Escherichia coli from urinary tract infections in a tertiary care hospital of North Eastern Karnataka. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2017;8(2):176-180. doi: 10.4103/0976-9668.210012. [DOI:10.4103/0976-9668.210012]
17. Fasugba O, Mitchell BG, Mnatzagani an G, Das A, Collignon P, Gardner A . Five-year antimicrobial resistance patterns of urinary Escherichia Coli at an Australian Tertiary Hospital :Time series analyses of prevalence data.PLoS ONE. 2016; 11(10):e0164306.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0164306. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0164306]
18. Ferdosi-Shahandashti E, Javanian M, Moradian-Kouchaksaraei M, et al. Resistance patterns of Escherichia coli causing urinary tract infection. Caspian J Inter Med. 2015; 6 (3): 148.
19. Sanchez GV, Master RN, Karlowsky JA, Bordon JM. In vitro antimicrobial resistance of urinary E coli among US outpatients from 2000 to 2010. Antimicrob Agent Chemother. 2012;56(4):2181-3. [DOI:10.1128/AAC.06060-11]
20. Alos JI , Serrano MG, Gomez Garces JL, Perianes J. Antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli from community-acquired urinary tract infections in relation to demographic and clinical data. Clin J Microbiol Infect. 2005;11(3): 199-203. DOI: 10.1111 / j.1469-0691.2004.01057.x [DOI:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.01057.x]
21. Rosa R, Abbo LM, Raney K, Tookes HE 3rd, Supino M. Antimicrobial resistance in urinary tract infections at a large urban emergency department: Contributing factors to empirical treatment failure. Am J Emerg Med. 2017;35(3):397-401. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.11.021. Epub 2016 Nov 9 [DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2016.11.021]
22. Foxman B. Urinary tract infection syndromes: occurrence, recurrence, bacteriology, risk factors, and burden disease. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2014; 28 (1): 1-13. [DOI:10.1016/j.idc.2013.09.003]
23. Spoorenberg V, Prins J, Stobberingh E, Hulscher M, Geerlings S. Adequacy of an evidence-based guideline treatment for complicated urinary tract infections in the Netherlands and the effectiveness of guideline adherence. Europ J Clin Microbiol & Infect Dis. 2013; 32 (12): 1545-56 [DOI:10.1007/s10096-013-1909-6]

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Advances in Medical and Biomedical Research

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb