Volume 30, Issue 139 (March & April 2022)                   J Adv Med Biomed Res 2022, 30(139): 101-108 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Tashakkor M, Akbari H, Mahdian M, Tobeiha M. Infusion Versus Bolus Esmolol on Hemodynamic Responses to Intubation in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypasses Grafting: a Randomized Clinical Trial. J Adv Med Biomed Res 2022; 30 (139) :101-108
URL: http://journal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-6261-en.html
Infusion Versus Bolus Esmolol on Hemodynamic Responses to Intubation in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypasses Grafting: a Randomized Clinical Trial
Mohammadreza Tashakkor1 , Hossein Akbari * 2, Mehrdad Mahdian3 , Mohammad Tobeiha4
1- Dept. of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
2- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran , akbari1350_h@yahoo.com
3- Trauma Research Center, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
4- Student Research Committee, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
Abstract:   (92794 Views)

Background and Objective: Perioperative myocardial ischemia remains one of the most serious complications of cardiac surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of bolus esmolol versus its infusion on hemodynamic responses after laryngoscopy and intubation in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
Materials and Methods: This double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted on 75 patients that were allocated into three groups. In the infusion group, 10 minutes prior to laryngoscopy 0.5 mg/kg esmolol was injected, and then, 200 µg/kg/minute esmolol was infused. In the bolus group, 2 minutes prior to the laryngoscopy 1.5 mg/kg bolus dose of esmolol was injected intravenously. In the control group, a bolus dose of normal saline was administered. Heart rate (HR), Systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressures and mean arterial pressure (MAP), were recorded every one minute from 10 minutes prior to laryngoscopy to 10 minutes after intubation. Repeated measure ANOVA was applied as statistical analysis.
Results: SBP was at the lowest rate since laryngoscopy was started until 10 minutes after intubation in the esmolol infusion group (P= 0.029). From the initiation of laryngoscopy to 6 minutes after the intubation, DBP was at the lowest rate in the infusion group. There was a significant difference between the groups regarding DBP changes during the measurement. ANOVA model showed that interaction between time and groups on SBP, MAP, and HR (P< 0.05).
Conclusion: According to our results, the exact doses of esmolol infusion significantly reduced the level of SBP during intubation, compared with bolus esmolol.

Keywords: Esmolol,  Laryngoscopy,  Tracheal Intubation,  Hemodynamic,  CABG
Full-Text [PDF 503 kb]   (47038 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (10774 Views)  

✅ According to our results, the exact doses of esmolol infusion significantly reduced the level of SBP during intubation, compared with bolus esmolol.


Type of Study: Clinical Trials | Subject: Clinical medicine
Received: 2020/10/13 | Accepted: 2021/05/25 | Published: 2022/01/31
References
1. Kaplan JA RD, Savino JS. : Kaplans cardiac anesthesia. , 6th ed edn: St . Louis: Elsevier; 2011.
2. Cork RC, Kramer TH, Dreischmeier B, Behr S, DiNardo JA: The effect of esmolol given during cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesthesia & Analgesia 1995, 80(1):28-40. [DOI:10.1213/00000539-199501000-00006]
3. Newsome LR, Roth JV, Hug Jr CC, Nagle D: Esmolol attenuates hemodynamic responses during fentanyl-pancuronium anesthesia for aortocoronary bypass surgery. Anesthesia & Analgesia 1986, 65(5):451-456. [DOI:10.1213/00000539-198605000-00004]
4. Reves J, Croughwell N, Hawkins E, et al.Esmolol for treatment of intraoperative tachycardia and/or hypertension in patients having cardiac operations. Bolus loading technique. J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg. 1990, 100(2):221-27. [DOI:10.1016/S0022-5223(19)35561-8]
5. Kling D, Boldt J, Zickmann B, Dapper F, Hempelmann G: The hemodynamic effects of a treatment with beta-receptor blockers during coronary surgery. A comparison between acebutolol and esmolol. Der Anaesthesist. 1990, 39(5):264-68.
6. Efe EM, Bilgin BA, Alanoglu Z, Akbaba M, Denker C: Comparison of bolus and continuous infusion of esmolol on hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy, endotracheal intubation and sternotomy in coronary artery bypass graft. Brazil J Anesthesiology (English Edition) 2014, 64(4):247-52. [DOI:10.1016/j.bjane.2013.07.003] [PMID]
7. Figueredo E, Garcia‐Fuentes E: Assessment of the efficacy of esmolol on the haemodynamic changes induced by laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: a meta‐analysis. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2001, 45(8):1011-22. [DOI:10.1034/j.1399-6576.2001.450815.x] [PMID]
8. Bensky KP, Donahue-Spencer L, Hertz GE, Anderson M, James R: The dose-related effects of bolus esmolol on heart rate and blood pressure following laryngoscopy and intubation. AANA J.2000, 68(5):437-443.
9. Hussain AM, Sultan ST: Efficacy of fentanyl and esmolol in the prevention haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. J College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan: JCPSP. 2005, 15(8):454-457.
10. Panahi Y, Akhavan A, Sahebkar A, et al.Investigation of the effectiveness of Syzygium aromaticum, Lavandula angustifolia and Geranium robertianum essential oils in the treatment of acute external otitis: A comparative trial with ciprofloxacin. J Microb, Immunol Infect.2014; 47( 3): 211-216 [DOI:10.1016/j.jmii.2012.10.002] [PMID]
11. Eidy M, Fazel MR, Abdolrahimzadeh H, Moravveji AR, Kochaki E,Mohammadzadeh M. Effects of pregabalin and gabapentin on postoperative pain and opioi consumption after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2017, 70(4):434. [DOI:10.4097/kjae.2017.70.4.434] [PMID] [PMCID]
12. Kamal M, Agarwal D, Singariya G, Kumari K, Paliwal B, Ujwal S: Effect dexmedetomidine on attenuation of hemodynamic response to intubation, skin incision, and sternotomy in coronary artery bypass graft patients: A double-blind randomized control trial. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2020, 36(2):255. [DOI:10.4103/joacp.JOACP_353_18] [PMID] [PMCID]
13. Kumari K, Gombar S, Kapoor D, Sandhu HS: Clinical study to evaluate the role of preoperative dexmedetomidine in attenuation of hemodynamic response to direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Acta Anaesthesiologica Taiwanica. 2015, 53(4):123-130. [DOI:10.1016/j.aat.2015.09.003] [PMID]
14. El-Shmaa NS, El-Baradey GF: The efficacy of labetalol vs dexmedetomidine for attenuation of hemodynamic stress response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. J Clin Anesthesia. 2016, 31:267-73. [DOI:10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.01.037] [PMID]
15. Sen B, Chaudhary A, Sen J: Hemodynamic changes with intravenou dexmedetomidine and intravenous esmolol for attenuation of sympathomimetic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in neurosurgical patients: A comparative study. J Datta Meghe Institute Med Sci Univ. 2019, 14(2):67.
16. Gogus N, Akan B, Serger N, Baydar M: The comparison of the effects of dexmedetomidine, fentanyl and esmolol on prevention of hemodynamic response to intubation. Brazil J Anesthesiol. 2014, 64(5):314-19. [DOI:10.1016/j.bjane.2013.10.012]
17. Gupta S, Tank P: A comparative study of efficacy of esmolol and fentanyl for pressure attenuation during laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. Saudi J Anaesthesia. 2011; 5(1):2. [DOI:10.4103/1658-354X.76473] [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Atlee JL, Dhamee MS, Olund TL, George V: The use of esmolol, nicardipine, or their combination to blunt hemodynamic changes after laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Anesthesia & Analgesia .2000, 90(2):280-85. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-200002000-00008 [DOI:10.1213/00000539-200002000-00008] [PMID]
19. Tan PH, Yang L, Shih H, Lin C, Lan K, Chen C: Combined use of esmolol and nicardipine to blunt the haemodynamic changes following laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia .2002, 57(12):1207-12. [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2044.2002.02624_4.x] [PMID]
20. Fernandez-Galinski S, Bermejo S, Mansilla R, Pol O, Puig M: Comparative assessment of the effects of alfentanil, esmolol or clonidine when used as adjuvants during induction of general anaesthesia. Europ J Anaesthesiol. 2004, 21(6):476-82. [DOI:10.1097/00003643-200406000-00010]
21. Ugur B, Ogurlu M, Gezer E, Aydin ON, Gürsoy F: Effects of esmolol, lidocaine and fentanyl on haemodynamic responses to endotracheal intubation. Clin Drug Invest. 2007, 27(4):269-277. [DOI:10.2165/00044011-200727040-00006] [PMID]
22. Feng C, Chan K, Liu K, Or C, Lee T: A comparison of lidocaine, fentanyl, and esmolol for attenuation of cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Acta Anaesthesiologica Sinica 1996, 34(2):61-67.
Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Advances in Medical and Biomedical Research

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb