جمعه 1 اسفند 1404
[Archive]
دوره 33، شماره 162 - ( Special Issue 1404 )
جلد 33 شماره 162 صفحات 7-7 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Hussain N A, AL-Khatieeb M M. Deflection Load of Different Orthodontic Fixed Lingual Retainers (An in-Vitro Study). J Adv Med Biomed Res 2025; 33 (162) :7-7
URL: http://journal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-7887-fa.html
URL: http://journal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-7887-fa.html
Deflection Load of Different Orthodontic Fixed Lingual Retainers (An in-Vitro Study). Journal of Advances in Medical and Biomedical Research. 1404; 33 (162) :7-7
چکیده: (119 مشاهده)
Background & Objective: Fixed retainer success is reported to increase with passive adaptation of the retainer wire to the tooth surface, reducing saliva contamination during bonding. Flexible wires minimize bond failures by reducing stress concentration inside the bonding compound; therefore, the ideal fixed orthodontic retainer should be passive and semi-rigid. This in-vitro study aimed to evaluate the deflection load of different orthodontic fixed lingual retainers, and evaluate the bending properties of a chain type stainless steel fixed retainer comparing it with the other types.
Materials and Methods: Five types of fixed bonded lingual retainers were flat metallic wire (FMW), round metallic wire (RMW), braided chain wire (BCW), and Fiber-reinforced composite with spot (SF) and full (FF) techniques were used to be tested. A three-point bending test was done at 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 mm, and maximum deflection with an acrylic Frasaco mandibular model.
Results: The FF retainer showed significantly higher load deflection values than other retainer types at 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 mm and at the maximum load deflection. On the other hand, there were no significant differences between the remaining types of fixed retainers, except for the significant differences between FMW and RMW, SF groups at 0.2 and 0.3 mm.
Conclusion: The FMW retainer showed the lowest load deflection values, the BCW retainer would be an excellent choice for retaining tooth position as it had an intermediate load deflection values compared with other retainer types; and the FF retainer had the largest values of load deflection.
نوع مطالعه: مقاله پژوهشی |
موضوع مقاله:
Health Improvement Strategies
دریافت: 1404/7/18 | پذیرش: 1404/8/25 | انتشار: 1404/10/8
دریافت: 1404/7/18 | پذیرش: 1404/8/25 | انتشار: 1404/10/8
فهرست منابع
1. Bearn DR. Bonded orthodontic retainers: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;108(2):207-13. [DOI:10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70085-4] [PMID]
2. Renkema AM, Renkema A, Bronkhorst E, Katsaros C. Long-term effectiveness of canine-to-canine bonded flexible spiral wire lingual retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139(5):614-21. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.06.041] [PMID]
3. Chinvipas N, Hasegawa Y, Terada K. Repeated bonding of fixed retainer increases the risk of enamel fracture. Odontology. 2014;102(1):89-97. [DOI:10.1007/s10266-012-0095-9] [PMID]
4. Geramy A, Retrouvey JM, Sobuti F, Salehi H. Anterior Teeth Splinting After Orthodontic Treatment: 3D Analysis Using Finite Element Method. J Dent (Tehran). 2012;9(2):90-8.
5. Arnold SN, Pandis N, Patcas R. Einflussfaktoren für den Umgang mit Kleberetainern in der deutschsprachigen Schweiz: eine Fragebogenerhebung: Eine Fragebogenerhebung. J Orofac Orthop. 2014;75(6):446-58. [DOI:10.1007/s00056-014-0239-3] [PMID]
6. Golshah A, Feyli SA. Bond Strength and Deflection of Four Types of Bonded Lingual Retainers. Int J Dent. 2022;2022:1707520. [DOI:10.1155/2022/1707520] [PMID] [PMCID]
7. Sifakakis I, Eliades T, Bourauel C. Residual stress analysis of fixed retainer wires after in vitro loading: can mastication-induced stresses produce an unfavorable effect?. Biomed Tech (Berl). 2015;60(6):617-22. [DOI:10.1515/bmt-2015-0013] [PMID]
8. International Orthodontic Services Catalog. 7th Edition. Stafford, TX, USA. 2023. Access online on Oct, 2025. Available from: [https://iosortho.com/Images/uploaded/catalog/ios%20catalog.pdf]
9. Smith DC. Recent developments and prospects in dental polymers. J Prosthet Dent. 1962;12(6):1066-78. [DOI:10.1016/0022-3913(62)90162-2]
10. Scribante A, Vallittu PK, Özcan M, Lassila LVJ, Gandini P, Sfondrini MF. Travel beyond Clinical Uses of Fiber Reinforced Composites (FRCs) in Dentistry: A Review of Past Employments, Present Applications, and Future Perspectives. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:1498901. [DOI:10.1155/2018/1498901] [PMID] [PMCID]
11. Kerosuo HM, Dahl JE. Adverse patient reactions during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2007;132(6):789-95. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.01.022] [PMID]
12. Iliadi A, Kloukos D, Gkantidis N, Katsaros C, Pandis N. Failure of fixed orthodontic retainers: A systematic review. J Dent. 2015;43(8):876-96. [DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2015.05.002] [PMID]
13. Kadhum AS, Alhuwaizi AF. The effect of composite bonding spot size and location on the performance of poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) retainer wires. J Bagh Coll Dent. 2021;33(2):1-9. [DOI:10.26477/jbcd.v33i2.2932]
14. Levin L, Samorodnitzky-Naveh GR, Machtei EE. The association of orthodontic treatment and fixed retainers with gingival health. J Periodontol. 2008;79(11):2087-92. [DOI:10.1902/jop.2008.080128] [PMID]
15. Zachrisson BU. Clinical experience with direct-bonded orthodontic retainers. Am J Orthod. 1977;71(4):440-8. [DOI:10.1016/0002-9416(77)90247-0] [PMID]
16. Zachrisson BU. The bonded lingual retainer and multiple spacing of anterior teeth. Swed Dent J Suppl. 1982;15:247-55.
17. Sifakakis I, Pandis N, Eliades T, Makou M, Katsaros C, Bourauel C. In-vitro assessment of the forces generated by lingual fixed retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139(1):44-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.02.029] [PMID]
18. Alavi S, Mamavi T. Evaluation of load-deflection properties of fiber-reinforced composites and its comparison with stainless steel wires. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2014;11(2):234-9.
19. Bartzela TN, Senn C, Wichelhaus A. Load-deflection characteristics of superelastic nickel-titanium wires. Angle Orthod. 2007;77(6):991-8. [DOI:10.2319/101206-423.1] [PMID]
20. Sfondrini MF, Gandini P, Tessera P, Vallittu PK, Lassila L, Scribante A. Bending Properties of Fiber-Reinforced Composites Retainers Bonded with Spot-Composite Coverage. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:8469090. [DOI:10.1155/2017/8469090] [PMID] [PMCID]
21. Bijelic J, Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Fracture load of tooth restored with fiber post and experimental short fiber composite. Open Dent J. 2011;5:58-65. [DOI:10.2174/1874210601105010058] [PMID] [PMCID]
22. Sayed ME, Lunkad H, Fageeh I, Jaafari M, Tawhari A, Muaidi T, et al. Comparative evaluation of compressive bond strength between acrylic denture base and teeth with various combinations of mechanical and chemical treatments. Coatings. 2021;11(12):1527. [DOI:10.3390/coatings11121527]
23. Hatf AD, Al-Khatieeb MM. Effect of ageing media on shear bond strength of metal orthodontic brackets bonded with different adhesive systems (A comparative in-vitro study). J Bagh Coll Dent. 2020;32(4):5-11. [DOI:10.26477/jbcd.v32i4.2912]
24. Baysal A, Uysal T, Gul N, Alan MB, Ramoglu SI. Comparison of three different orthodontic wires for bonded lingual retainer fabrication. Korean J Orthod. 2012;42(1):39-46. [DOI:10.4041/kjod.2012.42.1.39] [PMID] [PMCID]
25. Kadhum AS, Alhuwaizi AF. The efficacy of polyether-ether-ketone wire as a retainer following orthodontic treatment. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2021;7(3):302-12. [DOI:10.1002/cre2.377] [PMID] [PMCID]
26. Ruwiaee RA, Alhuwaizi AF. Effect of artificial aging test on PEEK CAD/CAM fabricated orthodontic fixed lingual retainer. J Bagh Coll Dent. 2022;34(2):1-6. [DOI:10.26477/jbcd.v34i2.3147]
27. Salih YA, Al-Janabi MF. Tensile force measurement by using different lingual retainer wires, bonding materials types and thickness (a comparative in vitro study). J Bagh Coll Dent. 2014;26(2):167-72. [DOI:10.12816/0015216]
28. Hatf AD, Al-Khatieeb MM. Different orthodontic adhesive systems and enamel demineralization around metal brackets assessed by a laser fluorescence device (a comparative an in-vitro study). J Res Med Dent Sci. 2020;8:16-23.
29. Al-Khatieeb MM, Mohammed SA, Al-Attar AM. Evaluation of a new orthodontic bonding system (Beauty Ortho Bond). J Baghdad Coll Dent. 2015;27(1):175-81. [DOI:10.12816/0015284]
30. Mohammed RR, Rafeeq RA. Evaluation of the Shear Bond Strength of Chitosan Nanoparticles-Containing Orthodontic Primer: An In Vitro Study. Int J Dent. 2023;2023:9246297. [DOI:10.1155/2023/9246297] [PMID] [PMCID]
31. Ohtonen J, Lassila L, Säilynoja E, Vallittu PK. The effect of material type and location of an orthodontic retainer in resisting axial or buccal forces. Materials. 2021;14(9):2319. [DOI:10.3390/ma14092319] [PMID] [PMCID]
32. Gravina M, Motta A, Almeida M, Quintão C. Orthodontic wires: knowledge to optimize clinical application. Rev Dental Press Orthod Ortop Facial. 2014(9):113-28.
33. Normando D, Capelozza Filho L. A method to re-treat the relapse of dental misalignment. Dent Press J Orthod. 2011;16:48-53. [DOI:10.1590/S2176-94512011000500009]
34. Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Lena A, Scribante A, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Flexural strengths of fiber-reinforced composites polymerized with conventional light-curing and additional postcuring. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132(4):524-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.09.036] [PMID]
35. Oshagh M, Heidary S, Dehghani Nazhvani A, Koohpeima F, Koohi Hosseinabadi O. Evaluation of histological impacts of three types of orthodontic fixed retainers on periodontium of rabbits. J Dent (Shiraz). 2014;15(3):104-11.
36. Scribante A, Gandini P, Tessera P, Vallittu PK, Lassila L, Sfondrini MF. Spot-Bonding and Full-Bonding Techniques for Fiber Reinforced Composite (FRC) and Metallic Retainers. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(10):2096. [DOI:10.3390/ijms18102096] [PMID] [PMCID]
37. Garoushi S, Vallittu P. Fiber-reinforced composites in fixed partial dentures. Libyan J Med. 2006;1(1):73-82. [DOI:10.3402/ljm.v1i1.4666] [PMID] [PMCID]
38. Narva KK, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK. Fatigue resistance and stiffness of glass fiber-reinforced urethane dimethacrylate composite. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;91(2):158-63. [DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.10.024] [PMID]
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
