سه شنبه 27 شهریور 1403
[Archive]
دوره 26، شماره 117 - ( 7-1397 )
جلد 26 شماره 117 صفحات 20-12 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Alereza H, Banihashem N, Akhlaghi I, Amri P, Barat S. The Effect of General Anesthesia and Spinal Anesthesia on Quality of Recovery after Abdominal Hysterectomy; Randomised Clinical Trial. J Adv Med Biomed Res 2018; 26 (117) :12-20
URL: http://journal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-5401-fa.html
URL: http://journal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-5401-fa.html
آل رضا حکیمه، بنی هاشم نادیا، اخلاقی ایمان، امری مله پرویز، برات شهباز. تاثیر بیهوشی عمومی و بی‌حسی نخاعی بر کیفیت ریکاوری بعد از هیسترکتومی شکمی: کارآزمایی بالینی تصادفی. Journal of Advances in Medical and Biomedical Research. 1397; 26 (117) :12-20
حکیمه آل رضا1 
، نادیا بنی هاشم1 ، ایمان اخلاقی1 ، پرویز امری مله* 1، شهباز برات1
، نادیا بنی هاشم1 ، ایمان اخلاقی1 ، پرویز امری مله* 1، شهباز برات1
1- دانشگاه علوم پزشکی بابل، بابل
چکیده: (149461 مشاهده)
Background and Objective: The low quality of recovery after anesthesia has prolonged postoperative hospitalization time. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia on quality of recovery after abdominal hysterectomy.
Materials and Methods: This study is a clinical trial on 100 women 35 to 70 years with ASA class I, II who candidate to abdominal hysterectomy. Patients were divided randomly into two groups, spinal and general anesthesia. Quality of recovery was measured by questionnaires QoR-40 (emotional states, physical comfort, emotional support, physical independence and pain) at 24 and 48 hours after surgery. The data were analyzed by T-test, Mann-Whitney and Chi-Square Tests and were considered statistically significant when P-value less than 0.05.
Results: Two groups had no significant difference for age, duration of anesthesia, duration of surgery
(P> 0.05). Total score of QoR-40 Questionnaire in the first 24 hoursin the general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia was 170.28 ± 11.72 and 177.24 ± 11.35 respectively (p = 00.3) and in the first 48 hours was 185.68 ± 7.38 and 192.04 ± 5 Respectively (p< 0.001). Average score of emotional states at 24 and 48 hours after surgery for spinal anesthesia group was significantly higher than the general anesthesia group
(p = 0.008 and p< 0.001).
Conclusion: Quality of recovery in spinal anesthesia was better than general anesthesia after abdominal hysterectomy.
نوع مطالعه: مقاله پژوهشی |
دریافت: 1397/8/19 | پذیرش: 1397/8/19 | انتشار: 1397/8/19
دریافت: 1397/8/19 | پذیرش: 1397/8/19 | انتشار: 1397/8/19
فهرست منابع
1. Raghvendra KP, Thapa D, Mitra S, Ahuja V, Gombar S, Huria A.Postoperative pain relief following hysterectomy: A randomized controlled trial. J Midlife Health. 2016; 7: 65-8. [DOI:10.4103/0976-7800.185327] [PMID] [PMCID]
2. Purwar B, Ismail KM, Turner N, et al. General or spinal anaesthetic for vaginal surgery in pelvic floor disorders (GOSSIP): a feasibility randomised controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2015; 26: 1171-8. [DOI:10.1007/s00192-015-2670-4] [PMID]
3. Ge DJ, Qi B, Tang G, Li JY. Intraoperative dexmedetomidine promotes postoperative analgesia and recovery in patients after abdominal hysterectomy: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Sci Rep. 2016; 23; 6: 21514. [DOI:10.1038/srep21514] [PMID] [PMCID]
4. Armendáriz-Buil I, Marenco-Arellano. Radical hysterectomy in a patient with steinert disease: spinal anaesthesia, ketamine and TAP and rectus sheath blocks. An Sist Sanit Navar. 2015; 38: 471-4. [DOI:10.4321/S1137-66272015000300014] [PMID]
5. Ahmadi A, Amri P, Shokri J, Hajian K.Comparison of the analgesic effect of intravenous paracetamol/midazolam and fentanyl in preparation of patients for colonoscopy: A double blind randomized clinical trial. Caspian J Intern Med. 2015; 6: 87.
6. Amri maleh P, Taghavi Y, Solimanian S. Aspiration pneumonitis after seizure in a patient undergone cesarean section: a case report. J Gorgan Uni Med Sci. 2012; 14: 119-23.
7. Nikbakhsh N, Amri P, Shakeri A, Shakeri A. Change in blood pressure and heart rhythm during transhiatal esophagectomy. Caspian J Intern Med. 2012l; 3: 541-5.
8. Kayalha H, Roushanfekr M, Ahmadi M. The comparison of ondansetron and meperidine to prevent shivering after anesthesia in patients undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgeries with general anesthesia. J Zanjan Univ Med Sci. 2014; 22: 14-22.
9. Naithani U, Meena MS, Gupta S, Meena K, Swain L, Pradeep DS. Dose-dependent effect of intrathecal dexmedetomidine on isobaric ropivacaine in spinal anesthesia for abdominal hysterectomy: Effect on block characteristics and hemodynamics. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2015; 31: 72-9. [DOI:10.4103/0970-9185.150549] [PMID] [PMCID]
10. Amri P, Hashemian SM, Sharifi G, Asgari AA, Intrathecal administration of digoxin in rabbits. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2007; 104: 469. [DOI:10.1213/01.ane.0000253779.18693.2a] [PMID]
11. Bagherpour A, Amri P, Saghebi R. Accidental intrathecal administration of digoxin. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2006; 103: 502-3. [DOI:10.1213/01.ANE.0000227204.25547.B1] [PMID]
12. Kahraman F, Eroglu A. The effect of intravenous magnesium sulfate infusion on sensory spinal block and postoperative pain score in abdominal hysterectomy. Biomed Res Int. 2014; 236024. [DOI:10.1155/2014/236024] [PMID] [PMCID]
13. Hojjat M, Amri P, Barat SH, Bijani A, Amri V. Comparison Effect of General and Spinal Anesthesia on Hemoglobin and Hematocrit Values in Women after Cesarean Section. J Ardabil Univ Med Sci. 2016; 15: 432-40.
14. Bahrami Gorji F, Amri P, Shokri J, Alereza H, Bijani A.Sedative and Analgesic Effects of Propofol-Fentanyl Versus Propofol-Ketamine During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Double-Blind Randomized ClinicalTrial. Anesth Pain Med. 2016; 22; 6: e39835. eCollection 2016 Oct.. [DOI:10.5812/aapm.39835] [PMID] [PMCID]
15. Amri P, Alijanpour E, Nickbakhsh N, Modarress R, Naghshineh A, Esmaeili M. Effects of gabapentin on postoperative pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2013; 23: 28-31.
16. Sekhavat L, Davar R, Behdad S.Efficacy of prophylactic dexamethasone in prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2015; 5: 175-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.jegh.2014.07.004] [PMID]
17. Achuthan S, Singh I, Varthya SB, Srinivasan A, Chakrabarti A, Hota D. Gabapentin prophylaxis for postoperative nausea and vomiting in abdominal surgeries: a quantitative analysis of evidence from randomized controlled clinical trials. Br J Anaesth. 2015; 114: 588-97. [DOI:10.1093/bja/aeu449] [PMID]
18. Lavand'homme P, De Kock M. The use of intraoperative epidural or spinal analgesia modulates postoperative hyperalgesia and reduces residual pain after major abdominal surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2006; 57: 373-9.
19. Kroon UB, Rådström M, Hjelthe C, Dahlin C, Kroon L. Fast-track hysterectomy: A randomised, controlled study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010; 151: 203-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.04.001] [PMID]
20. Gill TM, Feinstein AR. A critical appraisal of the quality-of-life measurements. JAMA. 1994; 272: 619-26.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1994.03520080061045 [DOI:10.1001/jama.272.8.619]
21. Gornall BF, Myles P, Smith L, et al. Measurement of quality of recovery using the QoR-40: a quantitative systematic review. 2013; 111: 1-9. [DOI:10.1093/bja/aet014] [PMID]
22. Catro-Alves LJ, De Azevedo VL, De Freitas Braga TF, Goncalves AC, De Oliveira GS Jr. The effect of neuraxial versus general anesthesia techniques on postoperative quality of recovery and analgesia after abdominal hysterectomy: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2011; 113: 1480-6. [DOI:10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182334d8b] [PMID]
23. Ge DJ, Qi B, Tang G, Li JY. Intraoperative Dexmedetomidine Promotes Postoperative Analgesia and Recovery in Patients after Abdominal Hysterectomy: a Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial. Sci Rep. 2016; 23; 6: 21514. [DOI:10.1038/srep21514] [PMID] [PMCID]
24. Sprung J, Sanders MS, Warner ME, et al. Pain relief and functional status after vaginal hysterectomy: intrathecal versus general anesthesia. Can J Anaesth. 2006; 53: 690-700. [DOI:10.1007/BF03021628] [PMID]
25. Wodlin N, Nilsson L, Kjølhede P, GASPI. The impact of mode of anaesthesia on postoperative recovery from fast-track abdominal hysterectomy: a randomised clinical trial. BJOG 2011; 118: 299-308 [DOI:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02697.x] [PMID]
26. Açıkel A, Öztürk T, Göker a, hayran gg, keleş gt. Comparison of patient satisfaction between general and spinal anaesthesia in emergency caesarean deliveries. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2017; 45: 41-46. [DOI:10.5152/TJAR.2017.38159] [PMID] [PMCID]
27. Cohn DE, Castellon-Larios K, Huffman L, et al. A prospective, comparative study for the evaluation of postoperative pain and quality of recovery in patients undergoing robotic versus open hysterectomy for staging of endometrial cancer .J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016; 23: 429-34. [DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2016.01.002] [PMID]
28. Caputo M, Alwair H, Rogers CA, et al. Thoracic epidural anesthesia improves early outcomes in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2011; 114: 380-90. [DOI:10.1097/ALN.0b013e318201f571] [PMID]
29. Jellish W, Thalji Z, Stevenson K, et al. A prospective randomize study comparing short and intermediate term perioperative outcome variables after spinal or general anesthesia for lumbar disk and laminectomy surgery. Anesth Analg J. 1996; 83: 559-64.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-199609000-00021 [DOI:10.1213/00000539-199609000-00021] [PMID]
30. Harsten A, Kehlet H, Toksvig-Larsen S. Recovery after total intravenous general anaesthesia or spinal anaesthesia for total knee arthroplasty: a randomized trial. Br J Anaesth. 2013; 1-9. [DOI:10.1097/01.SA.0000441020.85061.85]
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
