دوره 27، شماره 124 - ( 6-1398 )                   جلد 27 شماره 124 صفحات 30-23 | برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها

XML English Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Kosari Z, Dadashi M, Zenoozian S, Maghbouli M, Armani kian A, Eskandari Z. Comparing the Effectiveness of Neurofeedback and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Reducing Symptoms of Women with Migraine. J Adv Med Biomed Res 2019; 27 (124) :23-30
URL: http://journal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-5675-fa.html
Comparing the Effectiveness of Neurofeedback and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Reducing Symptoms of Women with Migraine. Journal of Advances in Medical and Biomedical Research. 1398; 27 (124) :23-30

URL: http://journal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-5675-fa.html

Comparing the Effectiveness of Neurofeedback and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Reducing Symptoms of Women with Migraine
چکیده:   (143853 مشاهده)

Background and Objective: Migraine is a neurological syndrome that involves one-way or two-way recurrent headaches with a moderate to severe severity and lasts from 2 to 72 hours. Chronic migraines occur for about 3 months and at least 15 days or more per month, with a global incidence of 1.4 to 2.2 percent. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of neurofeedback and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in reducing symptoms of women with migraine.
Materials and Methods: This is a quasi-experimental study with pre-test, post-test, and follow-up for 2 months. The sample consisted of 20 migraine patients aged 15-55 years. Initial evaluation (entrance examination and exit), implementation of the Ahvaz Migraine Questionnaire (AMQ), and Blanchard Headache Diary (BHD) were performed. Patients were randomly assigned to the neurofeedback treatment group (N=10) and tDCS (N=10). Subjects of each group were evaluated 4 times consisting before intervention. The data were analyzed using SPSS 23 software.
Results: The results of Mann-Whitney U test indicated that there was no significant difference between the two treatments during the stages of evaluation in the severity, duration, and number of pain attacks per month. The results of Friedman test showed that there was a significant difference between the severity of headaches and the number of pain attacks in one month in the treatment groups during the stages of evaluation, but the duration of pain relief in each group in the evaluation steps did not differ significantly.
Conclusion: Neurofeedback and tDCS treatments reduce the symptoms of migraine disease, but there is no significant difference between the two treatments in terms of headache symptoms improvement.

متن کامل [PDF 424 kb]   (155795 دریافت)    
نوع مطالعه: مقاله پژوهشی | موضوع مقاله: Health Improvement Strategies
دریافت: 1398/3/15 | پذیرش: 1398/12/17 | انتشار: 1398/12/17
فهرست منابع
1. Stilling J, Monchi O , Amoozegar F , Chantel T .Transcranial magnetic and direct current stimulation(TMS/tDCS) for the treatment of headache:A Systematic Review. Headache. 2019; 0:1-19. doi: 10.1111/head.13479 [DOI:10.1111/head.13479]
2. Khani Am, Zaravani A, Azad Mozzabadi E, Montazeri A, Roshan Branch R, Ghorbani A. Determine the effect of topiramate on prevention of resistant migraine headaches. Bringing Knowledge. 2009;14(1):11-1.
3. Buse DC MA, Fanning KM, Serrano D, et al. Chronic migraine prevalence, disability, and sociodemographic factors: results from the American migraine prevalence and prevention study. Headache. 2012;52(10):1456-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2012.02223.x. [DOI:10.1111/j.1526-4610.2012.02223.x]
4. Ahmadi A M, Jafari M, Sabzevari L, FallahTafti A, Bidaki R . Evaluation of the effect of hypnotherapy on the headache. Sleep Hypn. 2018;20(2):114-19.
5. Feng Y, Zhang B, Zhang J, Yin Y. Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on headache intensity and frequency of headache attacks in patients with migraine: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Headache. 2019; ;59:1436-47 [DOI:10.1111/head.13645]
6. Dikmen PY, Yavuz BG, Aydinlar EI. The relationships between migraine, depression, anxiety, stress, and sleep disturbances. Acta Neurologica Belgica. 2015;115(2):117-22. [DOI:10.1007/s13760-014-0312-0]
7. Aghayusefi A, Meymand MB. Study of general health, resiliency, and defense. Iran South Med J. 2013;16(2): 118-27.
8. Mirzaee MM. Prevalence of common migraine and its resulting loss of function in high school girl students in Shahrekord, 2002. Shahrekord Univ Med Sci J. 2003;5(4):55-62.
9. Stokes DA, Lappin MS. Neurofeedback and biofeedback with 37 migraineurs: a clinical outcome study. Behav Brain Funct. 2010;6(1):9. [DOI:10.1186/1744-9081-6-9]
10. Magis D. Neuromodulation in migraine: State of the art and perspectives. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2015;12(3):329-39. [DOI:10.1586/17434440.2015.1005606]
11. Smitherman TA. Nonpharmacologic treatment of migraine. Clinician's Manual on Migraine: Springer; 2016. 69-77. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-02777-7_5]
12. Rahmati N, Rostami R,Zali M R,Nowicki S, Zarei J.The effectiveness of neurofeedback on enhancing cognitive process involved in enterpreneurship abilities among primary school students in district.Basic Clin Neurosci.2014;5(4):277-84.
13. Moshkani-Farahani D, Tavalaee S, Fathi-Ashtiani A, Ahmadi K. The effectiveness of neurofeedback on the treatment of primary headaches in military personnel. J Milit Med. 2016;17(4):231-9.
14. Vosooghifard F, Alizadeh Zarei M, Nazari M A, Kamali M. The effect of neurofeedback training and neurofeedback with occupational therapy based on cognitive rehabilitation on executive functions in autistic children. J Mod Rehabil. 2013; 7(2): 28-34
15. Ninaus M, Kober S, Witte M, Koschutnig K, Neuper C, Wood G. Brain volumetry and self-regulation of brain activity relevant for neurofeedback. Biol Psychol. 2015;110:126-33. [DOI:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.07.009]
16. Utz KS, Dimova V, Oppenländer K, Kerkhoff G. Electrified minds: transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) as methods of non-invasive brain stimulation in neuropsychology-a review of current data and future implications. Neuropsychologia. 2010;48(10):2789-810. [DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.06.002]
17. Viganò A, D'Elia TS, Sava SL, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the visual cortex: a proof-of-concept study based on interictal electrophysiological abnormalities in migraine. J Headache Pain. 2013;14(1):23. [DOI:10.1186/1129-2377-14-23]
18. Yousefi V, Morsali Y, Dadashi M. Exposure and response prevention (ERP) versus transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in remission of obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Zanjan Univ Med Sci .2017;26(114):14-26.
19. Azizi M, Shahbaziyankhoni A. Study of obsessive-compulsive disorder in migraine sufferers and compared them with normal individuals. Razi Med J. 2017;24(106):106-13
20. Farahani DM, Tavallaie A, Ahmadi K, Ashtiani AF. Comparison of neurofeedback and ranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulation efficacy on treatment of primary headaches: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Iran Red Cres Med. 2014;16(7):77-99. [DOI:10.5812/ircmj.17799]
21. Gallagher RM, Kunkel R. Migraine medication attributes important for patient compliance: concerns about side effects may delay treatment. Headache. 2003;43(1):36-43. [DOI:10.1046/j.1526-4610.2003.03006.x]
22. Antal A, Kriener N, Lang N, Boros K, Paulus W. Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the visual cortex in the prophylactic treatment of migraine. Cephalalgia. 2011;31(7):820-8. [DOI:10.1177/0333102411399349]
23. Sepehri F, Asgari K, Najafi M, Abedi A, Jahanbazi A. The Ek with relaxation training on the reduction of the effectiveness of electromyography biofeedback of the duration of headaches in migraine patients:single case study. J Urmia Univ Med Sci. 2014;25(7):674-83.
24. Dobrushina O, Arina G, Osina E, Aziatskaya G. Clinical and psychological confirmation of stabilizing effect of neurofeedback in migraine. Europ Psychiatr. 2017;41:S253. [DOI:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.02.045]
25. Rocha S, Melo L, Boudoux C, Foerster Á, Araújo D, Monte-Silva K. Transcranial direct current stimulation in the prophylactic treatment of migraine based on interictal visual cortex excitability abnormalities: A pilot randomized controlled trial. J Neurol Sci. 2015;349(1-2):33-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.jns.2014.12.018]
26. Walker JE. QEEG-guided neurofeedback for recurrent migraine headaches. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience. 2011 Jan;42(1):59-61. [DOI:10.1177/155005941104200112]
27. Siniatchkin M, Hierundar A, Kropp P, Kuhnert R, Gerber W-D, Stephani U. Self-regulation of slow cortical potentials in children with migraine: an exploratory study. Apply Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2000;25(1):13-32. [DOI:10.1023/A:1009581321624]
28. Basiri N, Namdari K, Abedi A. The Effect of neuro feedback training on improving sleep quality of patient with insomnia. J Ilam Univ Med Sci.(2014). 23(4): 294-304 .
29. Ghayourkazemi F, Shamloo Z, Mashhadi A, Ghanaei A, Pasalar F. A Comparative study of the effectiveness of metacognitive therapy with neurofeedback training on metacognitive beliefs and anxiety symptoms in female students with social anxiety disorder. J Cog Psychol. 2016;4( (1 - 2):19-30.
بازنشر اطلاعات
Creative Commons License این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است.

کلیه حقوق این وب سایت متعلق به Journal of Advances in Medical and Biomedical Research می باشد.

طراحی و برنامه نویسی : یکتاوب افزار شرق

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Advances in Medical and Biomedical Research

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb