پنجشنبه 1 آذر 1403
[Archive]
دوره 30، شماره 142 - ( 7-1401 )
جلد 30 شماره 142 صفحات 406-397 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Meimandi M, Mohammadi P, Azad A, Zaree M. Psychological and Physical Fall Assessment Tools in Persian Older Adults: A COSMIN Systematic Review. J Adv Med Biomed Res 2022; 30 (142) :397-406
URL: http://journal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-6678-fa.html
URL: http://journal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-6678-fa.html
Psychological and Physical Fall Assessment Tools in Persian Older Adults: A COSMIN Systematic Review. Journal of Advances in Medical and Biomedical Research. 1401; 30 (142) :397-406
Psychological and Physical Fall Assessment Tools in Persian Older Adults: A COSMIN Systematic Review
چکیده: (50863 مشاهده)
Background and Objective: Fear of falling, balance, and environmental hazards are viewed as significant psychological and physical components in seniors. This systematic review was carried out to review psychometric properties of psychological and physical fall outcome measures in Persian older adults.
Materials and Methods: The databases were searched using the COSMIN guideline recommendation search strategy and filters. A systematic search was undertaken utilizing the PubMed, Scopus, Medline, CINAHL, PsychINFO, ProQuest, Cochrane library, Web of Science, Pedro, SID, CIVILICA, Magiran, MEDLIB, IranDoc, and IranMedex, from 1971 to June 2021. A further hand search for grey literature was carried out through Google Scholar to detect papers that were not captured in electronic records.
Results: Of the initial 1268 studies, 33 studies met the inclusion criteria. Eight psychological and 12 physical assessment tools were validated for Persian older adults. The constructs studied were structural validity, internal consistency, and hypothesis testing that were based on reliable methodology with superb quality. In contrast, content validity was either doubtful or not reported. Neither of the studies that were included examined cross-cultural adaptation and responsiveness. The overall quality of the psychometric properties of each measurement tool has a broad range of inconsistencies (from high to low).
Conclusion: As psychometric data proved inconsistency and conflict for the majority of studies, only provisional judgments may be established. Psychometric features for assessment instruments are clearly partial or lacking, limiting rationale for use in clinical settings or research until more psychometric information is provided.
نوع مطالعه: مقاله مروری |
موضوع مقاله:
Life science
دریافت: 1400/6/1 | پذیرش: 1401/3/30 | انتشار: 1401/5/17
دریافت: 1400/6/1 | پذیرش: 1401/3/30 | انتشار: 1401/5/17
فهرست منابع
1. Kovács E, Rozs F, Petridisz A, Erdős R, Majercsik E. Cross-cultural validation of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International to assess concerns about falls among Hungarian community-living older people. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(25):3070-5. [DOI:10.1080/09638288.2017.1366555] [PMID]
2. Fadavi-Ghaffari M, Azad A, Meimandi M, Arani-Kashani Z, Ghorbanpoor H. The psychometric properties of falls efficacy scale in the elderly Iranian residents of nursing homes. Iranian Rehabil J. 2019;17(3):197-206. [DOI:10.32598/irj.17.3.197]
3. Lopes KT, Costa DF, Santos LF, Castro DP, Bastone AC. Prevalence of fear of falling among a population of older adults and its correlation with mobility, dynamic balance, risk and history of falls. Brazil J Phys Ther. 2009;13(3):223-9. [DOI:10.1590/S1413-35552009005000026]
4. Van Vliet R, Hoang P, Lord S, Gandevia S, Delbaere K. Falls efficacy scale-international: A cross-sectional validation in people with Multiple Sclerosis. Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(5):883-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2012.10.034] [PMID]
5. Bandura A, Freeman W, Lightsey R. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Springer; 1999. [DOI:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158]
6. Huang T. Geriatric fear of falling measure: Development and psychometric testing. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006;43(3):357-65. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.04.006] [PMID]
7. Kempen G, Tood C, Van Haastregt J, et al. Cross-cultural validation of the falls efficacy scale international (FES-I) in older people: Results from Germany, the Netherlands and the UK were satisfactory. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;9(2):155-62. [DOI:10.1080/09638280600747637] [PMID]
8. Mak M, Lau A, Law F, Cheung C, Wong I. Validation of the Chinese translated activities-specific balance confidence scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:496-503. [DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.01.018] [PMID]
9. Mehdizadeh M, Lajevardi L, Habibi Sah, et al. The association between fear of falling and quality of life for balance impairments based on hip and ankle strategies in the drug on-and off-phase of patients with idiopathic Parkinson' disease. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2016;30(1):1121-32.
10. Mehdizadeh M, Martinez-Martin P, Habibi SA, et al. The association of balance, fear of falling, and daily activities with drug phases and severity of disease in patients with Parkinson. Basic Clin Neurosci. 2019;10(4):355-62. [DOI:10.32598/bcn.9.10.295] [PMID] [PMCID]
11. Langley FA, Mackintosh SF. Functional balance assessment of older community dwelling adults: A systematic review of the literature. Inter J Allied Health Sci Pract. 2007;5(4):13. [DOI:10.46743/1540-580X/2007.1174]
12. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An international Delphi study. Quality Life Res. 2010;19(4):539-49. [DOI:10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8] [PMID] [PMCID]
13. Park SH. Tools for assessing fall risk in the elderly: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging clinical and experimental research. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2018;30(1):1-16. [DOI:10.1007/s40520-017-0749-0] [PMID]
14. Moore DS, Ellis R. Measurement of fall-related psychological constructs among independent-living older adults: A review of the research literature. Aging Ment Health. 2008;12(6):684-99. [DOI:10.1080/13607860802148855] [PMID]
15. Strini V, Schiavolin R, Prendin A. Fall risk assessment scales: A systematic literature review. Nurs Rep. 2021;11(2):430-43. [DOI:10.3390/nursrep11020041] [PMID] [PMCID]
16. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097] [PMID] [PMCID]
17. Terwee CB, Jansma EP, Riphagen II, de Vet HC. Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments. Quality Life Res. 2009;18(8):1115-23. [DOI:10.1007/s11136-009-9528-5] [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Prinsen CA, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality Life Res. 2018;27(5):1147-57. [DOI:10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3] [PMID] [PMCID]
19. Meimandi M, Fadavi-Ghaffari M, Taghizadeh G, Azad A, Lajevardi L. Falls efficacy scale and single item question: screening accuracy for older adults residing in nursing homes. Clin Gerontol. 2020;16:1-8. [DOI:10.1080/07317115.2020.1858467] [PMID]
20. Tinetti ME, Richman D, Powell L. Falls efficacy as a measure of fear of falling. J Gerontology. 1990;45(6):239-43. [
https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/45.6.P239 [DOI:10.1093/geronj/45.6.P239] [PMID: 2229948]] [PMID]
21. Hellström K, Lindmark B, Fugl-Meyer A. The falls-efficacy scale, Swedish version: Does it reflect clinically meaningful changes after stroke? Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24(9):471-81. [DOI:10.1080/09638280110105259] [PMID]
22. Dadgari A, Hamid TA, Mousavi SA, Hakim N, Hin LP, Dadvar L. Internal consistency of Persian version of falls efficacy scale and activity-specific balance scale. Int J Health Studies. 2016;1(3):29-32.
23. Mosallanezhad Z, Salavati M, Hellström K, Sotoudeh GR, Nilsson Wikmar L, Frändin K. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Persian version of the modified falls efficacy scale. Disabi Rehabil. 2011;33(25-26):2446-53. [DOI:10.3109/09638288.2011.574774] [PMID]
24. Khajavi D. Validation and reliability of Persian version of fall efficacy scale-international (FES-I) in community-dwelling older adults. Salmand: Iranian J Ageing. 2013;8(2):39-47.
25. Baharlouei H, Salavati M, Akhbari B, Mosallanezhad Z, Mazaheri M, Negahban H. Cross-cultural validation of the Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I) using self-report and interview-based questionnaires among Persian-speaking elderly adults. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2013;57(3):339-44. [DOI:10.1016/j.archger.2013.06.005] [PMID]
26. Kashani VO, Golmohammadi B, Attarzadeh-Fadaki S. Preparing a short version of the international Falls Efficacy Scale to Iranian elders. J Clin Psychol. 2019;10(4):13-22.
27. Hassan H, Zarrinkoob H, Jafarzadeh S, Akbarzade Baghban A. Psychometric evaluation of persian version of activities-specific balance confidence scale for elderly Persians. Audi Vest Res J. 2015;24(2):54-63.
28. Kashani VO, Zarifkar M, Alinaghipoor Z. Determining validity and reliability of the persian version of activities-specific balance confidence scale for elderly. Koomesh J. 2018;20(4):705-12.
29. Khajavi D. Psychometric properties of persian translated version of activities-specific balance confidence scale (ABC) in Arak community-dwelling older adults. J Arak Uni Med Sci. 2017;20(125):39-48.
30. Heidarian S, Arab Ameri E, Sheikh M, Farrokhi A. Psychometric characteristics of the Persian version of the fear of falling avoidance behavior questionnaire in elderly. Motor Behave. 2020;12(41):99-120.
31. Sadeghi N, Heravi-Karimooi M, Rejeh N, Montazeri A. Translation and initial validation n of the Persian version of geriatric fear of falling measure (GFFM). Payesh (Health Monitor). 2021;20(3):347-56. [DOI:10.52547/payesh.20.3.347]
32. Khajavi D, MoradiVeghar M. Investigation of validity and reliability of persian translation of modified gait efficacy scale in older adults in Qom city (Iran). Qom Univ Med Sci. J. 2017;11(9):70-8.
33. Karimi E, Hassani Mehraban A, Akbar Fahimi M, Maghfouri B, Jamali AR. A self-report home environment screening tool for determining fall risk in Iranian older people. Salmand: Iranian J Ageing. 2019;14(3):272-83.
34. Maghfouri B, Hassani MA, Taghizadeh G, Aminian G, Jafari H. Internal consistency of reliability assessment of the Persian version of the home falls and accident screening tool. Iranian Rehabil J. 2013;11(18):46-50.
35. Maghfouri B, Mehraban AH, Taghizade G, Aminian G, Jafari H. Validity and reliability of Persian version of home falls and accident screening tool in Iranian elderly. J Modern Rehabil. 2012;5(4):9-14.
36. Hojati H, Dadgari A, Mirrezaie SM. Investigation of validity and reliability of persian version of Johns Hopkins fall risk assessment Tool among the elderly. Qom Univ Med Sci. J. 2018;12(2):45-53. [DOI:10.29252/qums.12.2.45]
37. Moulodi B, Azad A, Taghizadeh G, Roohi-Azizi M, Mohammadi P. Reliability and validity of Persian version of performance-oriented mobility assessment (POMA) in community-dwelling Iranian older adults: Psychometric properties. Iranian Rehabil J. 2020;18(1):39-48. [DOI:10.32598/irj.18.1.626.5]
38. Jahantabi-Nejad S, Azad A. Predictive accuracy of performance-oriented mobility assessment for falls in older adults: A systematic review. Med J Islam Repub Iran.2019;33(1):229-34. [DOI:10.47176/mjiri.33.38]
39. Dadgari A, Hamid TA, Hakim MN, et al. Accuracy of berg balance scale to predict falls among community elderly dwellers. Nurs Pract Today. 2015;2(1):34-40.
40. Salavati M, Negahban H, Mazaheri M, et al. The Persian version of the berg balance scale: Inter and intra-rater reliability and construct validity in elderly adults. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(20):1695-8. [DOI:10.3109/09638288.2012.660604] [PMID]
41. Pourmahmoudian P, Norasteh AA, Daneshmandi H, AtrKarRoshan Z. Best items to identify fall status in male older adults. Eur J Geriatr Gerontol. 2020;2(2):46-52. [DOI:10.4274/ejgg.galenos.2020.324]
42. Akbari Kamrani AA, Azadi F, Salavati M, Kazemi B. Prediction of risk of falling among institutionalized elderly people in Iran. Iranian Rehabil J. 2003;4(13):45-52.
43. Kashani VO, Salmanzade M, Bahrami L. Determination of validity and reliability of the Persian version of the 9-item berg balance scale in elderly people. Koomesh J. 2018;20(1):25-33.
44. Akbari Kamrani AA, Zamani Sani SH, Fathi Rezaie Z, Aghdasi MT. Concurrent validity of functional gait assessment, timed up and go, and gait speed tests in the Persian community-dwelling elderly. Iranian Rehabil J. 2010;8(2):15-20.
45. Aslankhani MA, Farsi A, Fathirezaie Z, Zamani Sani SH, Aghdasi MT. Validity and reliability of the timed up and go and the anterior functional reach tests in evaluating fall risk in the elderly. Salmand: Iranian J Ageing. 2015;10(1):16-25.
46. Azadi F, Parnianpour M, Shakeri H, et al. Relative and absolute reliability of timed up and go test in community dwelling older adult and healthy young people. Salmand: Iranian J Ageing. 2014;8(4):56-66.
47. Azad A, Sabet A, Taghizadeh G, Mohammadi-Nezhad T. Clinical assessment of persian translation of fullerton advanced balance scale in community-dwelling older adults. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(4):567-73. [DOI:10.1080/09638288.2018.1503731] [PMID]
48. Sabet A, Azad A, Taghizadeh G. Test-retest reliability, convergent validity, and internal consistency of the Persian version of fullerton advanced balance scale in Iranian community-dwelling older adults. Salmand: Iranian J Ageing. 2016;10(4):18-29.
49. Abdiani M, Golpayegani M, Khajavi D. Validity and reliability of Persian version of dynamic gait index in older men. Salmand: Iranian J Ageing. 2014;9(2):124-33.
50. Abdiani M, Golpayegani M, Khajavi D. Dynamic gait index in older women with and without history of falling. Iranian J Geriatric Nursing. 2015;1(4):36-48.
51. Akbari Kamrani AA, Zamani Sani H, Fathi Rezaie Z, Farsi A, Aghdasi M. Investigation of factor structure of Persian version of functional gait assessment in Iranian elderly. Salmand: Iranian J Ageing. 2010;5(3):16-22.
52. Kashani VO, Mokaberian M, Gol Mohamadi B, Salmanzade M. The determination of validity and reliability of the abbreviated version of BES Test in the elderly. J Develop Motor Learn. 2019;11(1):53-69.
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
