دوره 30، شماره 143 - ( 7-1401 )                   جلد 30 شماره 143 صفحات 506-501 | برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها


XML English Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Biglari S, Biglari A, Mazloomzadeh S. The Frequency of Consanguinity and Its Related Factors in Parents of Children with Genetic Disorders. J Adv Med Biomed Res 2022; 30 (143) :501-506
URL: http://journal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-6705-fa.html
The Frequency of Consanguinity and Its Related Factors in Parents of Children with Genetic Disorders. Journal of Advances in Medical and Biomedical Research. 1401; 30 (143) :501-506

URL: http://journal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-6705-fa.html


چکیده:   (30427 مشاهده)

Background and Objective: Consanguinity increases the incidence of genetic disorders. The frequency of consanguinity varies in different societies. There was no data regarding the frequency of consanguinity in Zanjan province. This study aimed to describe the prevalence of consanguineous unions in the parents of children with genetic disorders and its related factors in Zanjan, Iran.
Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study included children with genetic diseases referring to the medical genetics clinic in Zanjan's Musavi Hospital during 2014-2018. Data including consanguineous unions in families (up to three previous generations), types of genetic illnesses, child and parents' age, parental educational level, and occupation were collected and analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent t-test, and chi-square test.
Results: Of the 87 children, 41 (47.7%) were male, and 50 (59.5%) resided in urban areas. The mean age of the children was 6.5 years. The educational level of 56.6% of fathers and 50.6% of mothers were highschool diploma or higher. The parents of 44 children (51.8%) had consanguineous unions. The most common type of consanguineous union was between first cousins. The nature of the genetic disorders in 63 (72.4%) of children was molecular. The proportion of consanguinity was significantly higher in parents of children with molecular than chromosomal disorder (P<0.0001). Consanguinity had also a significant relationship with the children's age (P=0.04).
Conclusion: This study's outcomes illustrate that parents of more than half of children with genetic disorders had consanguinity and the frequency of consanguinity was more common in parents of children with molecular disease than chromosomal disorder. Given that, it is necessary to avoid consanguineous marriage as much as possible, and families with a history of molecular genetic disease, should be informed of the possible consequences.

متن کامل [PDF 273 kb]   (17180 دریافت)    
نوع مطالعه: مقاله پژوهشی | موضوع مقاله: Clinical Medicine
دریافت: 1400/6/15 | پذیرش: 1401/5/4 | انتشار: 1401/7/18

فهرست منابع
1. Bennett RL, Motulsky AG, Bittles A, et al. Genetic counseling and screening of consanguineous couples and their offspring: Recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. J Genet Couns. 2002;11(2):97-119. [DOI:10.1023/A:1014593404915]
2. Ali A, Zahad S, Masoumeh A, Azar A. Congenital malformations among live births at Arvand Hospital, Ahwaz, Iran-A prospective study. Pakistan J Med Sci. 2008;24(1):33.
3. Al-Gazali L, Dawodu A, Sabarinathan K, Varghese M. The profile of major congenital abnormalities in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) population. J Med Genet. 1995;32(1):7-13. [DOI:10.1136/jmg.32.1.7] [PMID] [PMCID]
4. Madi S, Al Naggar R, Al Awadi S, Bastaki L. Profile of major congenital malformations in neonates in Al-Jahra region of Kuwait. East Mediterranean Health J.2005; 11 (4); 700-706.
5. Mehrabi KA, Zeyghami B. The effect of consanguineous marriages on congenital malformation. J Res Med Sci. 2005.
6. Bener A, Hussain R. Consanguineous :union:s and child health in the state of Qatar. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2006;20(5):372-8. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-3016.2006.00750.x] [PMID]
7. Bener A, Hussain R, Teebi AS. Consanguineous marriages and their effects on common adult diseases: studies from an endogamous population. Med Principles Pract. 2007;16(4):262-7. [DOI:10.1159/000102147] [PMID]
8. Tadmouri GO, Nair P, Obeid T, Al Ali MT, Al Khaja N, Hamamy HA. Consanguinity and reproductive health among Arabs. Reproduct Health. 2009;6(1):1-9. [DOI:10.1186/1742-4755-6-17] [PMID] [PMCID]
9. Rajab A, Patton M. A study of consanguinity in the Sultanate of Oman. Ann Human Biol. 2000;27(3):321-6. [DOI:10.1080/030144600282208] [PMID]
10. Kerkeni E, Monastiri K, Saket B, Rudan D, Zgaga L, Ben Cheikh H. Association among education level, occupation status, and consanguinity in Tunisia and Croatia. Croatian Med J. 2006;47(4):656-61.
11. Mokhtar MM, Abdel-Fattah MM. Consanguinity and advanced maternal age as risk factors for reproductive losses in Alexandria, Egypt. Europ J Epidemiol. 2001;17(6):559-65. [DOI:10.1023/A:1014567800950] [PMID]
12. Husain MA, Bunyan MA. Consanguineous marriages in a Saudi population and the effect of inbreeding on prenatal and postnatal mortality. Ann Trop Paediatric. 1997;17(2):155-60. [DOI:10.1080/02724936.1997.11747879] [PMID]
13. Tayebi N, Yazdani K, Naghshin N. The prevalence of congenital malformations and its correlation with consanguineous marriages. Oman Med J. 2010;25(1):37. [DOI:10.5001/omj.2010.9] [PMID] [PMCID]
14. Mokhtari R, Bagga A. Consanguinity, genetic disorders and malformations in the Iranian population. Acta Biologica Szegediensis. 2003;47(1-4):47-50.
15. Abrar S, Safdar W, Hanif M, Shujaat N. Pregnancy outcomes of consanguinity among antenatal patients attending combined military hospital Quetta, Pakistan. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2018;30(3):423-7.
16. Hafizi L, Ghodsi K, Ghasemi M. Study of relation between consanguinity and somato-physical malformations. Iran J Obstet, Gynecol Infertil. 2012;15(13):10-5.
17. Rabieyan M, Safdari R, Azimi C. Study of the genetic disorders of couples attending genetics clinic, Imam Khomeini hospital complex during 1995 To 2004.Payavard. 2011;5(3):59-69.
18. Shahri P, Namadmalan M, Rafiee A, Haghighizadeh M. A case-control study of prevalence of consanguineous marriage among parents of handicapped and healthy children in Ahvaz. Jundishapur Sci Med J. 2010;9(5):473-82.
19. Kanaan ZM, Mahfouz R, Tamim H. The prevalence of consanguineous marriages in an underserved area in Lebanon and its association with congenital anomalies. Genet Test. 2008;12(3):367-72. [DOI:10.1089/gte.2007.0093] [PMID]
20. Ataee M, Karimzadeh-Shirazi K, Ahmadi-Jouybari T, Karami-Matin B, Aghaei A, Zinat-Motlagh F. Cognitive predictors of cousin marriage among couples visiting counseling centers in Kohgiluyeh-Boyer Ahmad province. J Educ Community Health. 2014;1(3):47-53. [DOI:10.20286/jech-010350]
21. Al Khabori M. Causes of severe to profound deafness in Omani paediatric population. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2004;68(10):1307-13. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijporl.2004.05.002] [PMID]
22. Jahantiq M, Mazaheri M, Rabaninia T, Javaheri A, Amjadi N. Prevalence of congenital anomalies in newborns in Zabol: A single hospital based study. World J Peri Neonatol. 2018;1(1):7-14.
23. Rashid Shomali S, Montazeri V, Akrami SM, Heshmat R, Larijani B. Prevalence of consanguineous marriages among patients referred to diabetes and osteoporosis clinics of Dr Shariati hospital, Tehran, Iran. Iran J Diabet Metab. 2007;7(1):85-90.
24. Davati A, Jafari F, Kholdi N, Sedaghat M. Frequency of consanguineous marriage in Tehran and some related factors. Koomesh. 2009;10(4):287-94.
25. Omrani M. Consanguinity and in children diseases: A risk faced by Families in west Azarbaijan province. J Urmia Univ Med Sci. 2005;(16 )2:84-90.

بازنشر اطلاعات
Creative Commons License این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است.

کلیه حقوق این وب سایت متعلق به Journal of Advances in Medical and Biomedical Research می باشد.

طراحی و برنامه نویسی : یکتاوب افزار شرق

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Advances in Medical and Biomedical Research

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb