Volume 32, Issue 155 (November & December 2024)                   J Adv Med Biomed Res 2024, 32(155): 397-404 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: IR.ZUMS.REC.1400.458

XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Shafiee S, Mohammadzadeh S, Shafiee H, Dehghani Soltani A, Ahmadi F, Nourian A. The Effects of the Maxillary Splint Headgear in Comparison with Twin Block Appliance on Early Treatment of Class II Skeletal Malocclusion. J Adv Med Biomed Res 2024; 32 (155) :397-404
URL: http://journal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-7532-en.html
1- School of Dentistry, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran
2- Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3- Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
4- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran
5- Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran , azin.nourian@gmail.com
Abstract:   (231 Views)
Background & Objective:  Class II malocclusion is one of the most common types of malocclusion, and if untreated, can lead to speech and health problems, temporomandibular discomfort, trauma risk to maxillary incisors, and psychological issues. Early treatment with appliances like Maxillary splint headgear (MSH) or Twin block can, therefore, be highly impactful. The present study aimed to compare the effects of MSH and Twin block on cephalometric landmarks to make an informed decision for optimal treatment planning.
 Materials & Methods:  The research comprised sixteen patients treated with a maxillary headgear splint and sixteen patients treated with a Twin block, and lateral cephalometric radiographs were evaluated before and after treatment. These two groups were compared due to orthodontic parameters using an independent t-test or Mann-Whitney test.
Results:  The results indicate that age and gender had no effect on the final treatment outcome. No significant differences were observed in cephalometric parameters (P>0.05) except for pre-treatment "ANB" and "Lip Competency at rest," which were higher in the MSH group (P=0.035 and 044, respectively).
Conclusion:  MSH and Twin block are equally effective in treating Class II malocclusion.
 
Full-Text [PDF 654 kb]   (106 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Clinical Medicine
Received: 2024/06/27 | Accepted: 2025/01/5 | Published: 2024/10/10

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Advances in Medical and Biomedical Research

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb