Volume 19, Issue 77 (6-2011)                   J Adv Med Biomed Res 2011, 19(77): 107-114 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Movahed F, Javadi A, Gholami H, Najitehrani A. The Validity of Transvaginal Sonography in the Measurement of Endometrial Thickness. J Adv Med Biomed Res 2011; 19 (77) :107-114
URL: http://journal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-1662-en.html
1- Faculty of Medicine, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran. , fmovahed@qums.ac.ir
2- Dept. of Social Sciences, Medical Faculty. Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
3- Ayattallah Mousavi Hospital, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.
4- Dept. of Pathalogy, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
Abstract:   (186435 Views)

Background and Objective: Transvaginal ultrasonography is a non invasive procedure for endometrial thickness evaluation in abnormal uterine bleeding. This technique is helpful for selecting patients for diagnostic tests. This study was designed to determine the validity of transvaginal sonography in the measurement of endometrial thickness.
Materials and Methods: A total of 71 women who were admitted for abdominal hysterectomy due to different causes in Kosar Hospital (2008–2009) were enrolled in the study. The main exclusion criteria was inability to measure endometrial thickness via transvaginal sonography. Endometrial thickness measurements were done prior to surgery. Histopathologic measurement of the fresh specimen was carried out immediately after surgery. Data were analyzed using T-test and kappa index.
Results: No ultrasound measurement was possible in 15% (11) of the patients. No statistically significant difference was observed in endometrial thickness between the two procedures. Taking into account 5 mm as a cut– off point, in 70% (42) of the patients, endometrial thickness was > 5 mm in both procedures. In 30% (18) of the patients, endometrial thickness in sonography was >5 mm, 11 cases of which were confirmed by histopathologic measurement. The remaining 7 cases were falsely reported as thick endometrium by sonography. The overall accuracy of sonography was about 83/3%, which was more efficient for samples with thin endometrium (89/8% vs. 72/8%).
Conclusion: Despite a concordance between transvaginal sonography and histopathology results for endometrial thickness evaluation, the former is faced with limitation as a single diagnostic test.

Full-Text [PDF 262 kb]   (165618 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article |
Received: 2011/11/17 | Accepted: 2014/06/22 | Published: 2014/06/22

References
1. Sheng J, Chen Y, Pan J. Combining transvaginal sonography and endometrial cytology in the diagnosis of endometrial disorders in postmenopausal women. Zhorghna Fu chan ke za zhi. 2001; 36: 341-3.
2. Carranaza-Lira S, Martinez-chequer JC, Santa Rita- Escamilla MT, Romo- Aguirre C. Evaluation of ultrasonographic variables of the endometrium in relation with histopathologic findings in patients with postmenopausal uterine bleeding. Ginecol obstet Mex.1996; 64: 552-5.
3. Shoham Z, Di Carlo C, patel A, Conway GS, Jacobs HS. Is it possible to run a successful ovulation induction program based solely on ultrasound monitoring? The importance of endometrial measurements. Fertil Steril. 1991; 56: 836-41. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)54652-4]
4. Karlsson B, Granberg S, Wikland M, et al. Transvaginal ultrasonography of the endometrium in women with postmenopausal bleeding-a Nordic multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 172: 1488-94. [DOI:10.1016/0002-9378(95)90483-2]
5. Smith-Bindman R, Kerlikowske K, Feldstein VA, et al. Endovaginal ultrasound to exclude endometrial cancer and other endometrial abnormalities. JAMA. 1998; 280: 1510-17. [DOI:10.1001/jama.280.17.1510] [PMID]
6. Berek JS, Novak E. Break and Novak's Gynecology. philadelphia, PA USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkin; 2005.
7. Fleischer AC, kalemeris GC, Machin JE, Entman SS, James AE Jr. Sonographic depiction of normal endometrium with histopathologic correlation. J ultrasound Med. 1986; 5: 445-52. [DOI:10.7863/jum.1986.5.8.445] [PMID]
8. Saxton DW, Farquhar CM, Rae T, Beard Rw, Anderson Mc, Wadsworth J. Accuracy of ultrasound measurements of female pelvic organs. BJOG. 1990; 97: 695-9. [DOI:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb16241.x] [PMID]
9. Saha TK, Amer SA, Biss J, et al. The validity of transvaginal ultrasound measurement of endometrial thickness: a comparison of ultrasound measurement with direct anatomical measurement. BJOG. 2004; 111: 1419-24. [DOI:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00177.x] [PMID]
10. Speroff L, Fritz MA. Clinical gynecologic endocrinology and infertility. Philadelphia, PA USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.
11. Taskin S, Bozaci EA, Seval MM, UnlÜ C. Transvaginal sonographic assessment of endometrial thickness and endometrial morphology in postmenopausal bleeding. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006; 92: 155 -6 . [DOI:10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.10.023] [PMID]
12. Odeh M, Vainerovsky I, Grinin V, kais M, Ophir E, Bornstein J. Three-dimensional endometrial volume and 3-dimensional power Doppler analysis in predicting endometrial carcinoma and hyperplasia. Gynecol Oncol. 2007; 106: 348-53 [DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.04.021] [PMID]
13. Mansour GM, El-Lamie IK, EL - kady MA, EL- Mekkawi SF, Laban M, Abou - Gabal AI. Endometrial volume as predictor of malignancy in women with postmenopausal bleeding. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007; 99: 206-10. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.07.024] [PMID]
14. Yaman C, Habelsberger A, Tews G, PÖlz W, Ebner T. The role of three - dimensional volume measurement in diagnosing endometrial cancer in patients with postmenopausal bleeding. Gynecol Oncol. 2008; 110: 390-5. [DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.04.029] [PMID]
15. Alcazar JL, Galvan R. Three - dimensional power Doppler ultrasound scanning for the prediction of endometrial cancer in women with postmenopausal bleeding and thickened endometrium. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 200: 44 e1-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2008.08.027] [PMID]

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Advances in Medical and Biomedical Research

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb