Volume 26, Issue 114 (3-2018)                   J Adv Med Biomed Res 2018, 26(114): 14-26 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Yousefi Asl V, Morsali Y, Dadashi M. Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP) Versus Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Remission of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. J Adv Med Biomed Res 2018; 26 (114) :14-26
URL: http://journal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-4957-en.html
Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP) Versus Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Remission of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
Vida Yousefi Asl1 , Yousef Morsali2 , Mohsen Dadashi *3
1- Dept.of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran
2- Dept. of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran
3- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran , mohsendadashi@zums.ac.ir
Abstract:   (166562 Views)

Background and Objective: Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a mental dysfunction. The main characteristics of OCD are serious and continuous mental and functional obsessions that severely inflict patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of exposure and response prevention (ERP) versus transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in reduction of anxiety symptoms and increase of global functioning in patients with OCD.
Materials and Methods: This study employed clinical trial with pre-post tests and follow-up. 20 patients with OCD who had referred to psychology and psychiatry clinic of Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Zanjan, were selected according to purposive sampling and were randomly assigned to two treatment groups. Throughout the baseline, post-treatment and follow-up (one month and two months after the treatment), the subjects were asked to complete Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) questioner. Global Assessment of functioning (GAFS) was also employed to evaluate global functioning. Eventually, the collected data was analyzed using SPSS (version 20).
Results: The results indicated that there was no considerable differences between the two groups regarding anxiety symptoms in the post-test, but there was significant differences in global functioning between ERP and tDCS.
Conclusion: The findings confirmed that both ERP and tDCS methods with pharmacotherapy were considerably effective in the reduction of anxiety signs and symptoms and the increase of global functioning in patients with OCD, but the effectiveness of ERP was clinically more significant than tDCS.

Keywords: Exposure and response prevention (ERP), Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), Anxiety
Full-Text [PDF 3832 kb]   (157190 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Clinical Trials |
Received: 2017/12/17 | Accepted: 2017/12/17 | Published: 2017/12/17
References
1. Dadsetan P, Ravanshenasi marazi tahavoli. Tehran: Samt. Tehran: Samt; 2011.
2. Sadock B SV. Synopsis of psychiatry: Behavioral sciences and clinical psychiatry. ed. t, editor. USA: Wolters Kluwer press; 2014.
3. Association AP. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th Edition: DSM-5. United States of America: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
4. Steketee GPT, Schemmel T. Obsessive compulsive disorder: The latest assessment and treatment strategies. Kansas City, MO: Compact Clinicals; 2006.
5. Simpson HB FE, liebowitz MD, Huppert JD. Cognitive behavioral therapy vs risperidone for augmenting serotonin reuptake inhibitors in obsessive compulsive disorder. JAMA Psychiat. 2013; 70: 1190-9. [DOI:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.1932] [PMID] [PMCID]
6. Foa EB, Liebowitz MD, Kozak M, et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of exposure and ritual prevention, clomipramin, and their combination in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder. JAMA Psychiat. 2005:151-61.
7. Leahy RHS, McGinn L. Treatment plans and interventions for depression and anxiety disorders. New York: Guilford press; 2012.
8. Feil JZA. Brain stimulation in the study and treatment of addiction. Neuro Sci Biobehav Rev. 2010; 34: 559-74. [DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.11.006] [PMID]
9. Bation RPE, Heasebeart F, Saoud M, Brunelin. Transcranial direct current stimulation in treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: An open-label pilot study. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2016; 65: 153-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2015.10.001] [PMID]
10. Group W. Development of the world health organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychological Medicine. 1998: 551-8. [DOI:10.1017/S0033291798006667] [PMID]
11. Pichakolayi A. Karayi darman farashenakhti bar ekhtelal vasvasi jabri. university of Tabriz. 2011: (in Persian).
12. Alilu M IM, Bakhshi pour A, Farnam A. Tasir ravesh haye darmani CBT, ERP dar OCD. pezeshki olum pezeshki Tabriz. 2008; 31: 71-7.
13. Asadi M, Shiralipour A, Shakuri Z. Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy(cbt) in treating patients with obsessive- compulsive disorder(Ocd). Shahid Sadoughi Univ Med Sci. 2012; 20: 396-405.
14. Abramowitz J A, Foa EB, ME F. Exposure and ritual prevention for obsessive-compulsive disorder: Effects of intensive versus twice-weekly sessions. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003; 71:394-8. [DOI:10.1037/0022-006X.71.2.394] [PMID]
15. Alizadeh Goradel J, Pouresmali A, Mowlaie M, F SM. The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on obsession-compulsion, anxiety, and depression of a patient suffering from obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Practice Clin Psychol. 2016; 4: 75-80. [DOI:10.15412/J.JPCP.06040201]
16. Del Casale A, Kotzalidis G, Rapinesi D, et al. Functional neuroimaging in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Neuro Psychobiol. 2011; 2: 61-85. [DOI:10.1159/000325223] [PMID]
17. Jesse R, Cougle KBW-T, Han-Joo Lee, Michael J. Mechanisms of change in ERP treatment of compulsive hand washing: Does primary threat make a difference? Behav Res Ther. 2007; 45: 1449-59. [DOI:10.1016/j.brat.2006.12.001] [PMID]
18. Hampstead BM, Briceno E, Mascaro N, Mourdoukoutas M, Bikson A. Current status of transcranial direct current stimulation in posttraumatic stress and other anxiety disorders. Curr Behav Neurosci Rep. 2016; 3: 95-101. [DOI:10.1007/s40473-016-0070-9] [PMID] [PMCID]
Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Advances in Medical and Biomedical Research

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb