Volume 29, Issue 136 (September & October 2021)                   J Adv Med Biomed Res 2021, 29(136): 293-301 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Abdalla M A. Age Differences of Human Frontal Sinus Measurements using CT Scan. J Adv Med Biomed Res 2021; 29 (136) :293-301
URL: http://journal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-6215-en.html
Age Differences of Human Frontal Sinus Measurements using CT Scan
Mohammad Ahmad Abdalla *
Dept. of Human Anatomy, College of Medicine, Tikrit University, Tikrit, Iraq , dr.mohammad68@tu.edu.iq
Abstract:   (129610 Views)

Background and Objectives: The frontal sinus is regarded as one of the human paranasal sinuses located in the frontal bone as a triangular-shaped cavity, which originates as separated space from the anterior ethmoid cells. Computed Tomography (CT) is a completely non-destructive technique that uses a high density of contrast to identify the air inside any bony sinus with soft tissue demarcated by air within a particular nasal cavity. This study aimed to measure the anteroposterior length, width, and height of frontal sinus in different age groups of both genders with axial, coronal, and sagittal CT scans, as well as identifying the pneumatization of that sinus according to the extent represented by CT scans.
Materials and Methods: A prospective study was conducted on a random sample of 250 subjects attending the Radiology Section of both Baghdad Medical City and Salah Al-Deen Teaching Hospitals from February 2019 to January 2020. Different age and gender groups from these individuals underwent measurement of the anteroposterior length, width, and height of frontal paranasal sinus in axial, sagittal, and coronal CT scans.
Results: The frontal air cells belonged to the anterior group including four types and one medial group with a prevalence of 37.6%, 18%, 16.8%, 6.8%, and 20.8%, respectively, through a series of CT scan sections. The mean values of frontal sinus length, width, and height for males were 19.8±8.7 mm, 32.8±8.7 mm, and 29.7±8.8 mm, respectively; and for females were 14.9±8.3 mm, 25.4±9.2 mm, and 22.5±9.2 mm, respectively.
Conclusion: A high incidence of frontal sinus cell types and supraorbital cells suggested the superioposterior partition of frontal sinus which tends to demonstrate more pneumatization than other partitions.

Keywords: Computed tomography (CT), Frontal sinus, Paranasal sinuses
Full-Text [PDF 596 kb]   (141737 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (4703 Views)  

✅ A high incidence of frontal sinus cell types and supraorbital cells suggested the superioposterior partition of frontal sinus which tends to demonstrate more pneumatization than other partitions.


Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Clinical Medicine
Received: 2020/09/11 | Accepted: 2021/03/17 | Published: 2021/04/4
References
1. Kountakis SE, Senior BA , Draf W. The frontal sinus. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2008;159-94
2. Amin SM. External endoscopic multiportal frontal sinus obliteration for laterally pneumatized frontal sinus: a feasibility study. Egypt J Otolaryngol. 2018;34:105-10. [DOI:10.4103/ejo.ejo_89_17]
3. Michael JM, Charles AR, Eric LW, et al.. Variability of paranasal sinus pneumatization in the absence of sinus disease. Ochsner J. 2020; 20(2):170-5. [DOI:10.31486/toj.19.0053]
4. Dassi CS, Demarco FR, Mangussi-Gomes J, Weber R, Balsalobre L, Stamm AC. The frontal sinus and frontal recess: anatomical, radiological and surgical concepts. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;24(3):e364-e375. [DOI:10.1055/s-0040-1713923]
5. Mohammad SA, Abdalla MA, Mahdi AJJ. Orbitometry of orbital opening and orbital cavity in neonate compared adult. Third Scientific Conference (Tikrit Med J). 2011; 210-6.
6. Fatu C, Puisoru M, Rotaru M , Truta AM. Morphometric evaluation of the frontal sinus in relation to age. Ann Anat. 2006;188: 275-80. [DOI:10.1016/j.aanat.2005.11.012]
7. Sahu N , Casiano R R. Nasal branch of the anterior ethmoid artery: a consistent landmark for a midline approach to the frontal sinus. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2019; 9(5): 562-6. [DOI:10.1002/alr.22278]
8. Shakeri K, Abesi F, Haghanifar S , Khafri. Evaluation of the morphometric variation of frontal sinus in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) of paranasal sinus. Caspian J Dent Res .2020; 9: 35-41.
9. Abdalla MA, Mahdi AJJ. Maxillary sinus measurements in different age groups of human cadavers. Tikrit J Dent Sci. 2013; 1: 107-12.
10. Shahab S, Sarikhani S, Manouchehri ME , Yazdanpanah P. Assessment of frequency and anatomical characteristics of Haller cells in cone-beam computed tomography scans of patients referring to a private oral and maxillofacial radiology clinic during 2015-2017. J Islam Dent Assoc Iran 2018; 30: 100-5. [DOI:10.30699/JIsdreir.30.3.100]
11. Balegh AH , Moustafa T. Anatomical variations of paranasal sinuses on multidetector computed tomography. On J Otolaryngol Rhinol. 2020; 3(2): 556. [DOI:10.33552/OJOR.2020.03.000556]
12. Abdalla MA. Pneumatization patterns of human sphenoid sinus associated with the internal carotid artery and optic nerve by CT scan. Ro J Neurol. 2020;19(4):244-51. [DOI:10.37897/RJN.2020.4.5]
13. Whaites E. Essentials of dental radiography and radiology. 4th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2007. p.79-334.
14. Souza LA Jr, Marana AN , Weber SAT. Automatic frontal sinus recognition in computed tomography images for person identification. Forensic Sci Int J. 2018; 286: 252-64 [DOI:10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.03.029]
15. Han D, Zhang L, Ge W, Tao J, Xian J, Zhou B. Multiplanar computed tomographic analysis of the frontal recess region in Chinese subjects without frontal sinus disease symptoms. ORL. 2008; 70 (2): 104-12. [DOI:10.1159/000114533]
16. Eweiss AZ , Khalil HS. The prevalence of frontal cells and their relation to frontal sinusitis: a radiological study of the frontal recess area. J Otolaryngol. 2013; 68: 75-82. [DOI:10.1155/2013/687582]
17. Tatlisumak E, Ovali GY, Aslan A , Asirdizer M , Zeyfeoglu Y , Tarhan S. Identification of unknown bodies by using CT images of frontal sinus. Forensic Sci Int J. 2007; 166(1): 42-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.03.023]
18. Riepert T , Ulmcke D , Schweden F , Nafe B. Identification of unknown dead bodies by X-ray image comparison of the skull using the X-ray simulation program Foxsis. Forensic Sci Int J. 2001; 117: 89-98. [DOI:10.1016/S0379-0738(00)00452-7]
19. Akhlaghi M, Bakhtavar K, Moarefdoost J, Kamali A , Rafeifar S. Frontal sinus parameters in computed tomography and sex determination. Leg Med (Tokyo) 2016; 19: 22-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.legalmed.2016.01.008]
20. Ruiz CR , Wafae N. Anatomo-radiological and morphometrical study of the frontal sinus in humans. Braz. J. Morphol. Sci. 2004; 21(1): 53-6.
21. Soares CB, Caio.Belem R, Almeida MS, et al.. Human identification study by means of frontal sinus imaginological aspects. Forensic Sci Int J. 2016; 262: 183-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.03.030]
22. Ribeiro FA. Standardized measurements of radiographic films of the frontal sinuses: an aid to identifying unknown persons. Ear Nose Throat J. 2000; 79: 26-33. [DOI:10.1177/014556130007900108]
23. Choby G , Thamboo A, Won TB, Kim J, Shih LC , Hwang PH. Computed tomography analysis of frontal cell prevalence according to the International Frontal Sinus Anatomy classification. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2018; 8: 825 -30. [DOI:10.1002/alr.22105]
24. Wormald PJ, Hoseman W, Callejas C, et al.. The international frontal sinus anatomy classification (IFAC) and classification of the extent of endoscopic frontal sinus surgery (EFSS). Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2016; 6: 677-96. [DOI:10.1002/alr.21738]
Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Advances in Medical and Biomedical Research

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb