1. Roberts CL, Nippita TA. International caesarean section rates: the rising tide. The Lancet Global Health. 2015; 3(5):e241-e2. [
DOI:10.1016/S2214-109X(15)70111-7] [
PMID]
2. Martin J, Hamilton B, Osterman M. Births in the United States, 2016 (NCHS Data Brief No. 287). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2017.
3. Lurie S, Shalev A, Sadan O, Golan A. The changing indications and rates of cesarean section in one academic center over a 16-year period (1997-2012). Taiwanese J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 55(4):499-502. [
DOI:10.1016/j.tjog.2014.12.014] [
PMID]
4. Nilsen C, Østbye T, Daltveit AK, Mmbaga BT, Sandøy IF. Trends in and socio-demographic factors associated with caesarean section at a Tanzanian referral hospital, 2000 to 2013. Int J Equit Health. 2014; 13(1):1-11. [
DOI:10.1186/s12939-014-0087-1] [
PMID] [
PMCID]
5. Chauhan S, Beydoun H, Hammad I, et al. Indications for caesarean sections at≥ 34 weeks among nulliparous women and differential composite maternal and neonatal morbidity. Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014; 121(11):1395-402. [
DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.12669] [
PMID]
6. Katikireddi SV, Gorman DR, Leyland AH. A comparison of trends in caesarean section rates in former communist (transition) countries and other European countries. Europ J Pub Health. 2013;23(3):381-3. [
DOI:10.1093/eurpub/cks165] [
PMID] [
PMCID]
7. Yavangi M, Sohrabi MR, Alishahi TA. Effect of Iranian ministry of health protocols on cesarean section rate: a quasi-experimental study. J Res Health Sci. 2013; 13(1):48-52.
8. Cheng YW, Eden KB, Marshall N, Pereira L, Caughey AB, Guise J-M. Delivery after prior cesarean: maternal morbidity and mortality. Clin Perinatol. 2011; 38(2):297-309. [
DOI:10.1016/j.clp.2011.03.012] [
PMID] [
PMCID]
9. Bellows P, Shah U, Hawley L, et al. Evaluation of outcomes associated with trial of labor after cesarean delivery after a change in clinical practice guidelines in an academic hospital. J Maternal Fetal Neonat Med. 2017; 30(17):2092-6. [
DOI:10.1080/14767058.2016.1237498] [
PMID]
10. Dodd JM, Crowther CA, Huertas E, Guise JM, Horey D. Planned elective repeat caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for women with a previous caesarean birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 10(12):CD004224. [
DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD004224.pub3]
11. Ananth CV, Friedman AM, Keyes KM, Lavery JA, Hamilton A, Wright JD. Primary and repeat cesarean deliveries: a population-based study in the United States, 1979-2010. Epidemiol (Cambridge, Mass). 2017; 28(4):567. [
DOI:10.1097/EDE.0000000000000658] [
PMID] [
PMCID]
12. Naji O, Wynants L, Smith A, Abdallah Y, Stalder C, Sayasneh A, et al. Predicting successful vaginal birth after Cesarean section using a model based on Cesarean scar features examined by transvaginal sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 41(6):672-8. [
DOI:10.1002/uog.12423] [
PMID]
13. Haumonte JB, Raylet M, Christophe M, et al. French validation and adaptation of the Grobman nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. J Gynecol Obstet Human Reproduct. 2018; 47(3):127-31. [
DOI:10.1016/j.jogoh.2017.12.002] [
PMID]
14. Asgarian A, Rahmati N, Nasiri F, Mohammadbeigi A. The failure rate, related factors, and neonate complications of vaginal delivery after cesarean section. Iran J Nursing Midwif Res. 2020; 25(1):65. [
DOI:10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_101_19] [
PMID] [
PMCID]
15. Charitou A, Charos D, Vamenou I, Vivilaki VG. Maternal and neonatal outcomes for women giving birth after previous cesarean. Europ J Midwif. 2019; 3. [
DOI:10.18332/ejm/108297]
16. Rweyemamu MA. Predictors and outcomes of women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery at Iringa regional referral hospital: The University of Dodoma; 2018.
17. Aya T, Emi A, Takahashi Y, Eiji K, Masaki M, Takeo N. Trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC) in Japan: rates and complications. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020; 301(4):995-1001. [
DOI:10.1007/s00404-020-05492-8] [
PMID]
18. Familiari A, Neri C, Caruso A, et al. Vaginal birth after caesarean section: a multicentre study on prognostic factors and feasibility. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020; 301(2):509-15. [
DOI:10.1007/s00404-020-05454-0] [
PMID]
19. Mizrachi Y, Barber E, Kovo M, Bar J, Lurie S. Prediction of vaginal birth after one ceasarean delivery for non-progressive labor. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018; 297(1):85-91. [
DOI:10.1007/s00404-017-4569-4] [
PMID]
20. Lazarou A, Oestergaard M, Netzl J, Siedentopf JP, Henrich W. Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC): fear it or dare it? An evaluation of potential risk factors. J Perinat Med. 2021; 49(7):773-82. [
DOI:10.1515/jpm-2020-0222] [
PMID]
21. Li YX, Bai Z, Long DJ, et al. Predicting the success of vaginal birth after caesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study in China. BMJ open. 2019; 9(5):e027807. [
DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027807] [
PMID] [
PMCID]